Diversity-Aware Weighted Voting for Imbalanced Binary Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Class imbalance problems in machine learning, where the number of positive examples is significantly smaller than negative examples, pose challenges in applications like fraud detection, medical diagnosis, and predictive maintenance, leading to high false positive rates.

Innovation Solution

An ensemble learning method that includes generatively oversampling minority class examples, learning base classifiers on subsamples, and combining them with a diversity-aware weighted majority vote classifier to minimize diversity on positive samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If standard classification methods are used on imbalanced datasets, then the model can be trained quickly and with simple architecture, but the false positive rate increases and classification precision deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification precisionVSAvoidensemble classifier complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the classification task into multiple base classifiers, each trained on different subsamples of the data. This segmentation allows each classifier to focus on specific aspects of the imbalanced dataset, improving overall precision while distributing the computational complexity across multiple simpler components rather than one complex model.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the weighting parameters of different base classifiers in the ensemble, assigning higher weights to classifiers that perform better on the minority class. This parameter adjustment optimizes the ensemble's ability to detect positive cases while controlling false positives, resolving the contradiction between reliability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If oversampling techniques are applied to balance the dataset, then the minority class representation improves, but the dataset size increases and training time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveminority class sample quantityVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and focuses only on the essential minority class samples by creating subsamples that contain representative positive cases. Instead of duplicating all minority samples through traditional oversampling, the method extracts key instances and uses them to train multiple specialized base classifiers, maintaining minority class representation without proportionally increasing training time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial oversampling by generating synthetic minority class samples only for specific subsamples rather than the entire dataset. This selective approach provides sufficient minority class representation for each base classifier while avoiding the computational burden of oversampling the complete dataset, thus reducing training time compared to full oversampling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If multiple base classifiers are trained to improve precision, then the classification accuracy improves, but the computational resources and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the classification problem into multiple base classifiers that process different subsamples independently. This segmentation improves measurement precision by having each classifier specialize in detecting specific patterns in the minority class, while the modular structure allows for efficient parallel processing that mitigates the productivity loss from using multiple classifiers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a weighted voting mechanism as an intermediary that combines the outputs of multiple base classifiers. This mediator efficiently aggregates the results of parallel classifiers, producing a final decision that benefits from the increased precision of multiple specialized models while maintaining processing speed through efficient voting logic rather than sequential processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If diversity is maximized among base classifiers to handle different data patterns, then the robustness improves, but the diversity between classifiers increases making coordination difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness to different patternsVSAvoidclassifier consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by training each base classifier on different subsamples with specific characteristics, allowing each classifier to develop specialized expertise for particular data patterns. This local specialization improves robustness to different patterns while the weighted voting mechanism ensures that classifiers with better local performance contribute more to the final decision, maintaining overall consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the weight parameters assigned to different base classifiers based on their performance characteristics. Classifiers that demonstrate better consistency and lower false positive rates on validation data receive higher weights. This parameter adjustment balances the diversity of patterns handled by different classifiers with the need for coordinated decision-making, ensuring that the most reliable classifiers have greater influence on the final outcome.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS12511881B2Diversity-aware weighted majority vote classifier for imbalanced datasets supporting decision making
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 NEC CORP
  • US12511881B2 patent drawing
  • US12511881B2 patent drawing
  • US12511881B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An ensemble learning based method is for a binary classification on an imbalanced dataset. The imbalanced dataset has a minority class comprising positive samples and a majority class comprising negative samples. The method includes: generatively oversampling the imbalanced dataset by synthetically generating minority class examples, thereby generating a generated dataset; using the generated dataset to generate subsamples, and learning a base classifier on each of the subsamples to determine a plurality of base classifiers; and learning a weighted majority vote classifier by combining outputs of the base classifiers. Each of the base classifiers is assigned a weight in such a way that a diversity between the base classifiers on the positive samples is minimized.