Replaceable Diverter Test Cell Insert for Downhole Flow Simulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing diverter test methods fail to accurately simulate subterranean fluid flow conditions due to limitations in modeling fluid flow area changes and inability to handle high pressures and temperatures, which restricts the evaluation of diverter materials in simulated downhole environments.

Innovation Solution

A diverter test cell system with a replaceable insert that includes an enclosure and a channel with varying dimensions, allowing for a constant cross-sectional area and simulating fluid flow through a fracture in a subterranean formation, coupled with a pumping system to maintain a consistent flow rate and replicate downhole conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If slot models are used to narrow the flow area, then the flow conditions are simplified, but the fluid flow area changes are not accurately accounted for creating unrealistic flow conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow model complexityVSAvoidfluid flow area accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The test cell is divided into distinct components: an enclosure structure and a replaceable insert with the channel. This segmentation allows the channel geometry to be precisely manufactured and independently optimized while keeping the overall test cell design modular and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The channel cross-sectional area is maintained substantially constant along its length, contrasting with traditional slot models that narrow. This parameter change (maintaining constant area rather than narrowing) creates realistic flow conditions that account for actual fluid flow area changes in subterranean formations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Temperature

If large scale flow models are used, then the physical dimensions are sufficient, but the models cannot handle pressures or temperatures above atmospheric conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperating temperature rangeVSAvoidmodel effectiveness in simulated conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The test cell is designed to operate under controlled pressure and temperature conditions that simulate downhole environments. The enclosure and insert configuration allows for pressurization and heating beyond atmospheric conditions, enabling realistic simulation of subterranean formation conditions while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The channel geometry and test cell structure are designed to replicate actual subterranean fracture conditions on a smaller, controlled scale. This scaled copying approach allows for high-pressure and temperature simulation that would be impractical in full-scale field conditions, while maintaining geometric similarity to actual formations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If a constant cross-sectional area channel is used, then realistic fluid flow conditions are achieved, but the channel dimensions must vary along the length

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefluid flow area accuracyVSAvoidchannel geometry
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The channel cross-sectional area is maintained substantially constant along its length, while the channel dimensions (width and height) are allowed to vary. This approach achieves realistic fluid flow conditions with accurate flow area representation, while accommodating the geometric constraints of the test cell enclosure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of varying the cross-sectional area (two-dimensional change), the channel geometry varies in one dimension (length) while maintaining constant cross-sectional area. This dimensional approach allows for realistic flow conditions without the complexity of varying cross-sections, simplifying the geometry while achieving the desired flow characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Adaptability or versatility

If the cover is permanently coupled to the body, then the enclosure is more structurally sound, but the insert cannot be replaced for different testing configurations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsert replaceabilityVSAvoidenclosure structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The enclosure is segmented into a body and a cover that can be selectively coupled and decoupled. This segmentation provides structural soundness when coupled while enabling insert replacement by allowing the cover to be removed, facilitating different testing configurations without compromising the overall enclosure design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The cover coupling mechanism transitions from a static permanent connection to a dynamic reversible connection. This allows the enclosure to be structurally sound during testing while enabling easy access for insert replacement, adapting the structural integrity based on the operational phase (testing vs. maintenance).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12140166B2Diverter test cell with replaceable insert
Publication Date: 2024.11.12 CHEVRON USA INC
  • US12140166B2 patent drawing
  • US12140166B2 patent drawing
  • US12140166B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A diverter test cell can include an enclosure having a body and a cover removably coupled to the body, where the body forms a cavity that is enclosed by the cover, where the body includes an inlet port and an outlet port in communication with the cavity. The diverter test cell can also include an insert removably disposed within the cavity, where the insert has a channel that forms continuously from a first end to a second end of the insert, where the channel has first width at the first end and a second width at the second end, where the first width is less than the second width, where the first end of the insert is adjacent to the inlet port of the enclosure, and where the second end of the insert is adjacent to the outlet port of the enclosure.