Divided Crossmember and Joint Cover for Vehicle Front Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing front vehicle body structure interferes with the steering shaft's optimal positioning due to a central crossmember, compromising both passenger compartment space and the steady deformation mode of the front side frames during a head-on collision.

Innovation Solution

A front vehicle body structure with divided left and right crossmembers that sandwich a cup-shaped joint cover, allowing the crossmember to extend at an optimal height and incorporating features like outriggers, stiffeners, and a vertical reinforcing member to manage collision loads and deformation effectively.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a central crossmember is disposed along the vehicle width direction, then the crossmember can be connected to the left and right front side frames, but the crossmember interferes with the joint cover through which the steering shaft is inserted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrossmember connection strengthVSAvoidpassenger compartment space
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The crossmember is divided into a left crossmember and a right crossmember that are disposed separately on the left and right sides of the vehicle, rather than as a single central component. This segmentation allows the joint cover to be positioned in the center without interference, enabling optimal steering shaft positioning while maintaining crossmember structural function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The crossmember structure transitions from a single central element to a distributed left-right configuration. This dimensional redistribution allows the joint cover to occupy the central space optimally while the crossmembers are positioned laterally, resolving the spatial conflict between structural support and steering mechanism positioning

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If the crossmember is disposed lower to avoid interfering with the joint cover, then the joint cover position is optimized, but the crossmember cannot be disposed at an optimum height for steady deformation mode during head-on collision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesteering shaft positioningVSAvoiddeformation mode stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting the crossmember into left and right separate components, each crossmember can be positioned at the optimal height for collision deformation while the central joint cover remains undisturbed. This segmentation decouples the positioning constraints that would otherwise force a compromise in either steering shaft positioning or deformation mode stability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each crossmember (left and right) can have locally optimized positioning and structural characteristics tailored to its specific function - the joint cover area prioritizes steering shaft accessibility while the crossmember areas maintain optimal height for deformation mode control during collisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the crossmember is disposed at an optimum height for steady deformation mode, then collision performance is improved, but the crossmember interferes with the joint cover and steering shaft positioning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeformation mode stabilityVSAvoidsteering shaft positioning
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The crossmember is segmented into left and right components that can be positioned laterally at the optimal height for deformation mode stability, while the central joint cover remains free to accommodate the steering shaft at its optimal position. This segmentation eliminates the interference that would exist with a single central crossmember

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Device complexity

If a single central crossmember is used, then the structure is simpler, but both the steering shaft positioning and crossmember deformation function cannot be optimized simultaneously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecrossmember structureVSAvoidoverall system performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

While increasing the number of crossmember components from one to two, the segmentation enables both the joint cover and crossmembers to be positioned at their respective optimal locations. The left and right crossmembers can be independently optimized for deformation mode while the central joint cover optimizes steering shaft positioning, achieving superior overall system performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS8702158B2Structure for vehicle body front portion
Publication Date: 2014.04.22 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US8702158B2 patent drawing
  • US8702158B2 patent drawing
  • US8702158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A structure for a vehicle body front portion, provided with a cross-member (24) which is provided to a dashboard lower panel (19) on the engine room (13) side thereof and is extended between left and right front side frames (16, 16). The cross-member (24) is divided into left and right cross-members (65, 66). A cup-shaped joint cover (22) is sandwiched between the left and right cross-members (65, 66).