Divided-Chamber Engine Knock Control via Sub-Chamber Fuel Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Divided-combustion-chamber engines face challenges in fuel injection timing and ignition control, leading to difficulties in stabilizing combustion due to knocking or combustion failure, particularly when the air-fuel ratio is lean.

Innovation Solution

A control device with main-chamber and sub-chamber fuel injection means, coupled with an ECU that estimates knocking intensity and frequency, adjusts fuel amounts, and retards ignition timing to stabilize combustion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a conventional engine control device is used, then the control logic is simple and device complexity is low, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate when multiple sensors fail or output abnormal values

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetermination accuracy of abnormal sensorVSAvoidcontrol logic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs preliminary determination of whether a sensor is abnormal by comparing sensor output values with predetermined threshold values before using the sensor data for control decisions. This preliminary action prevents propagation of erroneous data from failed sensors, improving measurement precision without requiring complex real-time analysis during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device establishes a feedback mechanism where sensor outputs are continuously monitored and compared against threshold values. When abnormal values are detected, the system provides feedback to switch between sensor inputs or adjust control strategies, ensuring reliable operation even when multiple sensors fail. This feedback loop maintains determination accuracy while keeping the control logic structured and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If multiple sensors are used to improve reliability, then reliability deteriorates when sensor failures occur and abnormal values are output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol reliability under sensor failureVSAvoidsensor output accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

When sensor failures are detected through threshold comparison, the control device extracts and removes the abnormal sensor data from the control calculation. By taking out the unreliable sensor inputs, the system maintains control reliability using only valid sensor data, preventing the propagation of measurement errors while preserving overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The control device dynamically changes operational parameters by switching between different sensor inputs based on their validity. When a sensor outputs abnormal values, the system changes the active sensor parameter to an alternative valid sensor, thereby maintaining measurement precision and control reliability even in the presence of sensor failures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Object-affected harmful factors

If sensor output values are not verified, then device complexity is low, but harmful factors increase due to incorrect control decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveincorrect control decisionsVSAvoidverification process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs preliminary verification of sensor output values by comparing them against predetermined threshold values before using the data for control decisions. This preliminary check prevents incorrect control decisions caused by abnormal sensor readings while maintaining a relatively simple verification process that does not require complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control device introduces threshold values as an intermediary reference for verifying sensor outputs. This intermediary mechanism provides a simple yet effective way to detect abnormal sensor values and prevent harmful control decisions without requiring complex verification algorithms, thus reducing the complexity of the verification process while eliminating harmful factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP4279730B1Engine control device
Publication Date: 2026.05.06 MITSUBISHI MOTORS CORP
  • EP4279730B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4279730B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4279730B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4B

AI summary

A control device for controlling an engine includes main-chamber injecting means (1,3) that supplies a main chamber (8) with fuel; sub-chamber injecting means (2) that supplies a sub chamber (5) with fuel after the main chamber injecting means (1,3) supplies the fuel; estimating means (21) that estimates a degree of knocking serving as indices of an intensity of the knocking and an occurrence frequency of the knocking; and fuel controlling means (22) that carries out, when the degree (N) of the knocking is a first predetermined value (N1) or more, fuel control that reduces a sub-chamber fuel amount representing an amount of fuel supplied by the sub-chamber injecting means (2). By reducing the sub-chamber fuel amount in this manner, the occurrence of knocking can be suppressed, so that the combustion state of a divided-combustion-chamber engine can be enhanced.