Divided Spring Arm Plug for Reliable Automotive Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Plugs used in the automotive industry often fail to properly lock into sockets due to applied force during assembly, leading to potential disengagement and operational failures, especially in sealed connectors where excess pressure can dislodge the plug.

Innovation Solution

A plug design with a spring arm divided into a locking arm and an actuating arm, where the actuating arm is longer and overlaps the locking arm, preventing direct force application that could block the locking mechanism, and featuring a protection element to reduce unintentional actuation and enhance stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If force is applied at the spring arm during assembly, then the plug can be inserted into the socket, but the locking arm may be blocked by a finger and fail to move properly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidreliability of locking engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The spring arm is divided into two separate arms: a locking arm (5) with the latch and an actuating arm (6) for applying force. This segmentation allows the locking arm to remain unobstructed during assembly while the actuating arm receives the assembly force, resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and reliability of locking engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The force application point is extracted from the locking arm and relocated to the actuating arm. By taking out the locking function from the force application path, the locking arm can move freely during assembly without being blocked by fingers, while still achieving reliable locking engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If the spring arm is divided into locking arm and actuating arm, then reliability of locking is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of locking engagementVSAvoidcomplexity of spring arm structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking arm (5) and actuating arm (6) are merged into a single spring arm assembly that is formed as one integral component. This merging reduces device complexity by eliminating the need for separate locking and actuating components, while still providing the functional separation needed for reliable locking engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design ensures reliable engagement and disengagement of the plug, reducing the risk of operational failures and rattling noises, while maintaining mechanical stability and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

a spring arm (2), in this case comprising a locking arm (5) and an actuating arm (6)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP1950844B1Divided spring arm
Publication Date: 2013.08.21 TE CONNECTIVITY GERMANY GMBH
  • EP1950844B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3

AI summary

The invention relates to a plug (1), preferably for an electrical plug-in connection, with a spring arm (2) comprising a latch (3) for engagingly connecting to a corresponding socket (4), the spring arm comprising a locking arm (5) and an actuating arm (6), and the actuating arm overlapping the locking arm in the actuating direction of the actuating arm, at least in part, and the actuating arm being longer than the locking arm.