Deep Learning Artifact Detection in Medical Imaging
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Current medical imaging technologies, such as CT, PET, and MRI, suffer from noise and artifacts that obscure pathology, leading to false negatives or false positives, and there is no automated mechanism for real-time artifact detection and correction during the imaging process, resulting in inefficiencies and prolonged workflow times.
Innovation Solution
Integration of deep learning networks, specifically convolutional neural networks (CNNs), into the imaging workflow for real-time artifact detection and correction in both sinogram and image domains, allowing for adjustments to scan parameters, post-processing, and decision-making on whether to abort or reperform scans.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If deep learning networks are integrated into the imaging workflow for real-time artifact detection and correction, then image quality and clinical efficiency are improved, but device complexity increases
Solution Approach 1:
A deep learning network is introduced as an intermediary component between the CT scanner and the reconstruction pipeline. The network receives sinogram data and reconstructed images as input, performs artifact detection and correction, and outputs corrected images. This intermediary approach allows the system to leverage pre-trained deep learning models without fundamentally redesigning the entire imaging system, thus improving image quality while managing complexity through modular integration.
2Productivity
If automated artifact detection and correction is implemented, then workflow time is reduced and productivity increases, but device complexity and computational requirements increase
Solution Approach 1:
The deep learning network is pre-trained on large datasets of annotated medical images with various artifacts before deployment. During actual imaging workflows, the pre-trained network performs rapid inference to detect and correct artifacts in real-time. This preliminary training phase separates the computationally intensive model development from the clinical workflow, allowing automated artifact correction to run efficiently during patient scans without adding significant computational burden to the imaging workflow.
3Speed
If deep learning networks are used for real-time processing, then artifact correction speed is improved, but computational energy consumption increases
Solution Approach 1:
The artifact detection and correction functionality is extracted as a separate deep learning network module that operates independently from the main CT reconstruction pipeline. The network processes only the necessary data (sinograms and reconstructed images) to identify and correct artifacts, rather than reprocessing the entire imaging workflow. This extraction allows for optimized computational resource allocation and energy-efficient processing of artifact-prone regions.
4Loss of time
If automated deep learning-based artifact correction is implemented, then the need for rescans is reduced, but initial system setup and training complexity increase
Solution Approach 1:
The deep learning network is designed to autonomously detect artifacts, determine the appropriate correction strategy, and apply corrections without requiring manual intervention from technologists or radiologists. The system self-manages the entire artifact correction workflow, from detection to correction to validation, thereby eliminating the need for rescans while maintaining simplicity in operational procedures despite the underlying computational complexity.
Data Source
AI summary
A method and apparatus are provided that use deep learning (DL) networks to reduce noise and artifacts in reconstructed computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. DL networks are used in both the sinogram and image domains. In each domain, a detection network is used to (i) determine if particular types of artifacts are exhibited (e.g., beam-hardening artifact, ring, motion, metal, photon-starvation, windmill, zebra, partial-volume, cupping, truncation, streak artifact, and/or shadowing artifacts), (ii) determine whether the detected artifact can be corrected through a changed scan protocol or image-processing techniques, and (iii) determine whether the detected artifacts are fatal, in which case the scan is stopped short of completion. When the artifacts can be corrected, corrective measures are taken through a changed scan protocol or through image processing to reduce the artifacts (e.g., convolutional neural network can be trained to perform the image processing).


