Deep Learning Confidence Score via Image Reconstruction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Deep learning models in medical imaging often produce incorrect results without indicating failure, limiting their reliability in clinical environments due to the lack of confidence scores, necessitating manual verification.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a second deep learning model to generate a confidence score for the output of a first deep learning model, indicating the reliability of the results, by reconstructing the input image and comparing it to the original, using metrics like mean square error or structural similarity, and providing alerts based on predefined confidence intervals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a deep learning model is used to process images and generate output results, then the productivity and automation of image analysis is improved, but the reliability of the results deteriorates because the model cannot indicate when it fails

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of image analysisVSAvoidreliability of output results
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

A confidence score mechanism is introduced as an intermediary between the deep learning model and the final output. This confidence score, generated either by the model itself or by a second independent model, serves as a mediator that indicates the reliability of predictions. When confidence scores fall below thresholds, the system can trigger manual review or alternative processing, thus maintaining automation while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where confidence scores are continuously monitored and used to adjust processing. Low confidence predictions trigger feedback actions such as manual verification, reprocessing with different parameters, or alerting operators. This feedback mechanism ensures that unreliable predictions are caught and corrected, improving overall system reliability while maintaining high automation for confident predictions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If confidence scores are generated using a second independent deep learning model, then the reliability of confidence assessment is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of confidence scoreVSAvoidcomplexity of model architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the confidence assessment function into separate modules: the primary deep learning model for image processing, an optional second independent model for confidence scoring, and a confidence evaluation system. This segmentation allows flexibility where the second model can be added or removed based on reliability requirements, managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The confidence scoring mechanism is designed to be universal and adaptable. The same framework can work with different types of deep learning models and can operate with either self-generated or externally-generated confidence scores. This multi-functionality allows the system to adjust complexity based on specific application needs without redesigning the entire architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If manual verification is required for deep learning model predictions, then the reliability of results is improved, but the productivity and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of predictionsVSAvoidefficiency of image analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring manual verification for all predictions, the system applies partial action by performing manual review only for predictions with low confidence scores. High confidence predictions are processed automatically without manual intervention. This selective approach maintains high productivity for reliable predictions while ensuring reliability through manual verification when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the processing parameter (automatic vs. manual review) based on the confidence score threshold. By adjusting this parameter according to the reliability indicator, the system optimizes the balance between productivity and reliability, automatically processing high-confidence cases and selectively verifying low-confidence cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10997717B2Method and system for generating a confidence score using deep learning model
Publication Date: 2021.05.04 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS AG
  • US10997717B2 patent drawing
  • US10997717B2 patent drawing
  • US10997717B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a system and method for analyzing images, an input image is provided to a computer and is processed therein with a first deep learning model so as to generate an output result for the input image; and applying a second deep learning model is applied to the input image to generate an output confidence score that is indicative of the reliability of any output result from the first deep learning model for the input image.