Dynamic Mechanical Analysis Data Transformation for Strain Rate Prediction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for measuring mechanical properties of materials, particularly thermoplastics like HDPE, are limited by the inability to directly apply frequency-domain DMA results to engineering problems, as they do not provide sufficient information on mechanical response at varying strain rates and temperatures, and there is a lack of correlation between DMA results and tensile/compressive tests.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to transform frequency-domain DMA data into a time-domain representation using temperature sweep and frequency sweep tests, generating a master curve through time-temperature superposition, which allows for the prediction of elastic modulus over a wide range of strain rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If DMA frequency-domain results are used directly, then testing time is reduced, but the results cannot be applied to engineering problems requiring strain rate information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting timeVSAvoidapplicability to engineering problems
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the data representation by changing parameters from frequency-domain (ω) to time-domain (t) through mathematical transformation. This allows DMA results to provide strain rate information relevant to engineering applications while maintaining the efficiency of DMA testing. The transformation converts storage modulus E'(ω) and loss modulus E''(ω) into relaxation modulus E(t) and creep compliance J(t), which can then be used to predict material behavior at different strain rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If tensile and compression tests are conducted at various strain rates to obtain comprehensive material behavior data, then engineering design accuracy is improved, but testing time and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveengineering design accuracyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a mathematical model (relaxation modulus E(t) and creep compliance J(t)) that copies the material's viscoelastic behavior across different strain rates. Once the model is established from DMA data, it can predict material response at any strain rate without conducting additional physical tests. This eliminates the need for extensive tensile and compression testing at multiple strain rates while maintaining engineering design accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses parameter transformation to convert frequency-domain parameters into time-domain parameters that directly relate to strain rate. By establishing the relationship between frequency and strain rate through mathematical transformation, the method enables prediction of material behavior at different strain rates from a single DMA experiment, avoiding the need for multiple physical tests.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If split-Hopkinson pressure bar is used for high strain rate testing, then strain rate measurement capability is improved, but device complexity and measurement reliability issues arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestrain rate measurement capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical testing systems (split-Hopkinson pressure bar) with a mathematical transformation approach. Instead of using specialized high-speed mechanical equipment to measure strain rate, the method uses DMA combined with frequency-time domain transformation to predict material behavior at high strain rates. This substitution eliminates the need for complex mechanical testing apparatus while maintaining the ability to assess material response at relevant strain rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Loss of information

If multiple testing methods are used to correlate DMA results with tensile test data, then comprehensive understanding of material behavior is improved, but measurement complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive understanding of material behaviorVSAvoidmeasurement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the DMA method universal by enabling it to provide multiple types of material property information through mathematical transformation. The same DMA experiment that measures storage and loss moduli also provides relaxation modulus and creep compliance data that can be used for both dynamic and static loading conditions. This eliminates the need for separate tensile tests and other characterization methods, reducing measurement complexity while maintaining comprehensive understanding of material behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the prediction of elastic modulus at different strain rates, reducing the need for extensive testing and providing a comprehensive understanding of material behavior, thereby enhancing the applicability of DMA results in mechanical design.

Implementation Method 1

DMA provides storage modulus E' and loss modulus E'' data

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectViscoelasticity: Viscoelasticity

Implementation Method 2

using the second data set to generate a master curve in a frequency domain of the at least one of the storage modulus of the sample or the loss modulus of the sample using time-temperature superposition

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime-temperature superposition:

Implementation Method 3

converting the master curve in the frequency domain into a time domain relaxation function

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFourier transform:

Data Source

PatentUS10345210B2Method to estimate strain rate dependent elastic modulus of materials using dynamic mechanical analysis data
Publication Date: 2019.07.09 NEW YORK UNIV
  • US10345210B2 patent drawing
  • US10345210B2 patent drawing
  • US10345210B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for predicting an elastic modulus of a material includes providing a sample in a dynamic mechanical analysis device, performing a temperature sweep test to obtain a first data set, performing a frequency sweep test to obtain a second data set, using the second data set to generate a master curve in a frequency domain of the at least one of the storage modulus of the sample or the loss modulus of the sample using time-temperature superposition, converting the master curve in the frequency domain into a time domain relaxation function, and using the time domain relaxation function to predict the elastic modulus of the material.