Dimethyl Ether Production via Crude Methanol Dehydration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current processes for producing dimethyl ether (DME) from raw methanol face challenges due to the negative effects of oxygen-containing trace components, particularly carbonyl compounds, which lead to catalyst deactivation, clogging, and impurities in the DME product, making it difficult to achieve stable long-term operation.

Innovation Solution

A process involving the catalytic dehydration of raw methanol in the gas phase using a metal-doped hydrophobic zeolite catalyst followed by γ-Al2O3 or SiO2/Al2O3, with strict control over carbonyl compound content, specifically limiting total carbonyl compounds to 100 ppm by weight or less, to prevent undesirable side reactions and maintain catalyst stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If pure methanol is used for DME production, then catalyst activity is maintained, but energy consumption increases and equipment complexity increases due to multi-stage distillation requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst activity stabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter of methanol purity requirements by establishing specific limits for carbonyl compounds (≤100 ppm) rather than requiring complete purification to pure methanol standards. This parameter change allows the use of raw or partially purified methanol while maintaining catalyst stability, thereby reducing the energy consumption associated with multi-stage distillation processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If multi-stage distillation is used to purify methanol, then catalyst deactivation is prevented, but device complexity and investment costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecatalyst stabilityVSAvoidequipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention simplifies the purification equipment by changing the purity parameter requirements. Instead of requiring complete removal of all impurities through multi-stage distillation, the invention specifies acceptable limits for carbonyl compounds (≤100 ppm) and other impurities, allowing the use of simpler single-stage distillation or even direct use of raw methanol after stabilization, thereby reducing device complexity and investment costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention applies preliminary stabilization treatment to raw methanol before DME synthesis, which includes removing dissolved gases and controlling carbonyl compound content. This preliminary action prevents catalyst deactivation without requiring complex multi-stage distillation equipment, thus reducing device complexity while maintaining catalyst stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Use of energy by moving object

If raw methanol with high carbonyl compound content is used, then energy consumption and equipment complexity are reduced, but catalyst deactivation and coking occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveenergy consumptionVSAvoidcatalyst activity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention establishes specific parameter limits for carbonyl compounds (≤100 ppm) and other impurities in raw methanol. By controlling these parameters, the invention prevents catalyst deactivation and coking while avoiding the need for energy-intensive multi-stage distillation. The stabilized raw methanol meets these parameter requirements through simplified purification processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If conventional aluminum oxide catalysts are used with raw methanol, then process simplicity is maintained, but catalyst deactivation occurs due to water content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcatalyst lifetime
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDuration of action of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention uses a composite catalyst system consisting of hydrophobic zeolite combined with aluminum oxide or silica-alumina. This composite material combines the hydrophobic properties of zeolite (which resist water-induced deactivation) with the catalytic activity of aluminum oxide, thereby extending catalyst lifetime in raw methanol processing while maintaining process simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention employs hydrophobic zeolite as a protective layer that can be easily replaced or regenerated. The zeolite acts as a sacrificial component that protects the main aluminum oxide catalyst from water-induced deactivation, extending the overall catalyst system lifetime while maintaining affordable replacement options.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures stable long-term operation and high purity of DME production by minimizing the formation of unwanted trace components and deposits, maintaining catalyst activity, and reducing energy consumption by using raw methanol directly without extensive purification.

Implementation Method 1

catalytic dehydration of raw methanol in the gas phase

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCatalysis: Catalysis

Implementation Method 2

hydrophobic zeolite as a dehydration catalyst, which deactivates less strongly in the presence of water

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdsorption: Adsorption

Implementation Method 3

cooling, partial condensation and separation of the gaseous product mixture

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCondensation: Condensation

Data Source

PatentEP2322494B1Production of dimethyl ether from crude methanol
Publication Date: 2013.01.09 LURGI

AI summary

Producing dimethyl ether by catalytic dehydration of crude methanol as a feed in the gas phase comprises (a) providing the crude methanol from low-pressure methanol synthesis, (b) evaporating the crude methanol and adjusting the reaction temperature and reaction pressure, (c) charging a reactor filled with dehydration catalyst with the evaporated crude methanol with defined space velocity, (d) conducting a gaseous product mixture comprising dimethyl ether, unreacted methanol and water and (e) cooling, partially condensing and separating the gaseous product mixture. Producing dimethyl ether by catalytic dehydration of crude methanol as a feed in the gas phase comprises (a) providing the crude methanol from the low-pressure methanol synthesis, (b) evaporating the crude methanol and adjusting the reaction temperature and reaction pressure, (c) charging a reactor filled with dehydration catalyst with the evaporated crude methanol with defined space velocity, (d) conducting a gaseous product mixture comprising dimethyl ether, unreacted methanol and water, and (e) cooling, partially condensing and separating the gaseous product mixture, where gaseous dimethyl ether, liquid water and methanol are obtained as products, the methanol is recycled to step (a), the crude methanol contains a total content of carbonyl compounds of higher than 100 (preferably greater than 50) wt.ppm, calculated as mass equivalents of acetone. An independent claim is included for the crude methanol.