DNA Assembly Design Automation via Gibson Overhangs

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current DNA assembly methods face challenges in efficiently assembling multiple DNA sequence fragments into a single, circular DNA sequence due to limitations in restriction enzyme compatibility and the need for repeated cloning processes, which hinder automation and parallelization.

Innovation Solution

A method is developed to design and implement DNA assembly by receiving a list of DNA sequence fragments, designing oligonucleotides, and creating plans for adding flanking homology sequences or optimized overhangs, facilitating the use of SLIC/Gibson/CPEC or Golden-gate assembly methods to enable cost-effective direct synthesis and reduce the need for PCR amplification.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple cloning sites with restriction enzymes are used for DNA assembly, then DNA fragments can be stitched together, but the complexity of finding compatible sites increases with each additional fragment to be assembled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly efficiencyVSAvoidrestriction site compatibility complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the restriction enzyme dependency from the assembly process by using Gibson assembly, which relies on exonuclease-generated overhangs rather than restriction enzyme sites. This removes the complexity of finding compatible restriction sites across multiple fragments while maintaining the ability to assemble DNA sequences efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the fundamental parameter of assembly mechanism from restriction enzyme-based ligation to exonuclease-based overlap extension. By using exonucleases to generate single-stranded overhangs that are then annealed and ligated, the system achieves fragment assembly without requiring compatible restriction sites, thereby reducing combinatorial complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Extent of automation

If traditional restriction enzyme cloning is used, then DNA assembly can be performed, but the process requires multiple separate cloning steps that are difficult to automate and parallelize

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoidassembly throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate cloning steps into a single Gibson assembly reaction. By combining exonuclease digestion, overhang generation, annealing, and ligation into one unified process, the system enables automation and parallelization that were not feasible with traditional multi-step restriction cloning methods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal assembly system where the same Gibson assembly protocol can be applied to join any number of DNA fragments with different sequences. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for fragment-specific restriction site selection and allows for automated high-throughput assembly of diverse DNA sequences

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If repeated cloning processes are used to assemble multiple fragments, then DNA assembly can be achieved, but PCR-derived mutations accumulate and reduce assembly reliability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly accuracyVSAvoidnumber of cloning steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent skips the intermediate cloning steps that would otherwise be required to assemble multiple fragments. By using Gibson assembly, the system directly joins fragments through overlap extension without requiring repeated restriction digestion and ligation cycles, thereby reducing the number of PCR amplification steps that could introduce mutations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach automates the DNA assembly design process, reduces the complexity of assembly steps, and enhances the efficiency of assembling multiple fragments with reduced PCR-derived mutations, enabling more efficient and scalable DNA assembly protocols.

Implementation Method 1

designing DNA oligonucleotides (oligos) for each of the DNA sequence fragments, and creating a plan for adding flanking homology sequences to each of the DNA oligos

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHomology-based annealing:

Implementation Method 2

creating a plan for adding optimized overhang sequences to each of the DNA oligos

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOverhang formation:

Data Source

PatentUS20240312565A1Scar-Less Multi-Part DNA Assembly Design Automation
Publication Date: 2024.09.19 RGT UNIV OF CALIFORNIA
  • US20240312565A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312565A1 patent drawing
  • US20240312565A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides a method of a method of designing an implementation of a DNA assembly. In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes (1) receiving a list of DNA sequence fragments to be assembled together and an order in which to assemble the DNA sequence fragments, (2) designing DNA oligonucleotides (oligos) for each of the DNA sequence fragments, and (3) creating a plan for adding flanking homology sequences to each of the DNA oligos. In an exemplary embodiment, the method includes (1) receiving a list of DNA sequence fragments to be assembled together and an order in which to assemble the DNA sequence fragments, (2) designing DNA oligonucleotides (oligos) for each of the DNA sequence fragments, and (3) creating a plan for adding optimized overhang sequences to each of the DNA oligos.