Deep Neural Network for Selective Streak Artifact Removal in Medical Imaging

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current medical imaging technologies, such as MRI and CT, face challenges in rapidly removing streak artifacts and noise from images acquired with incomplete data, leading to reduced image quality and increased reconstruction time, especially in real-time imaging applications.

Innovation Solution

The use of deep neural networks to selectively and independently remove streak artifacts and noise from medical images by mapping them to residual components, allowing for flexible control over the de-noising process and reducing computational intensity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If incomplete acquisition of measurement data is used to increase image acquisition speed, then image acquisition speed is improved, but imaging artifacts and reduced signal-to-noise ratio occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage acquisition speedVSAvoidimaging artifacts
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes imaging artifacts from the reconstructed image by processing the image data to identify and eliminate artifact components while preserving the underlying anatomical information. This is achieved through image processing algorithms that separate artifact signals from valid image signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting reconstruction parameters, filtering parameters, or processing parameters to reduce artifacts. This may include modifying regularization parameters, filter cutoff frequencies, or iterative reconstruction parameters to optimize the balance between artifact removal and image quality preservation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Object-affected harmful factors

If sophisticated reconstruction techniques are used to remove imaging artifacts, then imaging artifacts are reduced, but reconstruction time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging artifactsVSAvoidreconstruction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selectively removing only the most prominent artifacts or applying artifact removal to specific regions of interest rather than processing the entire image uniformly. This reduces computational burden while maintaining effective artifact reduction in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs accelerated reconstruction algorithms that skip certain computationally intensive steps or use approximate methods that provide sufficient artifact removal with reduced computation time. This may include using fast Fourier transform optimizations or simplified iterative reconstruction schemes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

3Object-affected harmful factors

If CS reconstruction is used to reduce imaging artifacts, then imaging artifacts are reduced, but computational intensity and reconstruction complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging artifactsVSAvoidreconstruction complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs simpler, computationally less intensive artifact removal methods that can be applied quickly without requiring complex optimization algorithms. These methods may include conventional filtering techniques or simplified iterative approaches that provide adequate artifact reduction with lower computational cost and simpler implementation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

4Object-affected harmful factors

If conventional artifact removal methods are used, then imaging artifacts are reduced, but control over independent removal of different artifact types is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimaging artifactsVSAvoidcontrol flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the artifact removal process into distinct components, allowing independent processing of different artifact types. By separating the removal of streak artifacts, motion artifacts, and noise into independent processing steps or parameters, the system provides flexible control over the extent and type of artifact removal applied to the image.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12125175B2Methods and system for selective removal of streak artifacts and noise from images using deep neural networks
Publication Date: 2024.10.22 GE PRECISION HEALTHCARE LLC
  • US12125175B2 patent drawing
  • US12125175B2 patent drawing
  • US12125175B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems are provided for independently removing streak artifacts and noise from medical images, using trained deep neural networks. In one embodiment, streak artifacts and noise may be selectively and independently removed from a medical image by receiving the medical image comprising streak artifacts and noise, mapping the medical image to a streak residual and a noise residual using the trained deep neural network, subtracting the streak residual from the medical image to a first extent, and subtracting the noise residual from the medical image to a second extent, to produce a de-noised medical image, and displaying the de-noised medical image via a display device.