Collaboration Document Ranking via Interaction Weights

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing collaboration tools lack effective methods for ranking and prioritizing shared documents and users based on interaction data and access rights, leading to inefficient information retrieval and decision-making in business intelligence applications.

Innovation Solution

A collaboration application that computes document and user ranks using interaction statistics and predefined factors, such as access rights, views, modifications, and sharing activities, to provide an ordered list of relevant documents and users, enhancing information access and collaboration processes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If collaboration tools provide sharing capabilities for documents and data, then users can access and collaborate on corporate information, but the tools lack effective methods for ranking and prioritizing shared documents and users based on interaction data and access rights

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation retrieval efficiencyVSAvoidrelevance prioritization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of document presentation from unsorted or simple chronological order to a ranked order based on multiple factors including interaction statistics (views, downloads, edits) and access rights. This parameter change enables the system to prioritize documents by relevance, directly improving information retrieval efficiency while maintaining comprehensive access to all shared documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by collecting interaction data (views, downloads, edits, shares) from user activities with shared documents. This feedback is then processed to compute relevance scores that determine the ranking of documents and users. The feedback loop continuously improves the accuracy of relevance prioritization based on actual user behavior patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the system provides access to all shared documents and users, then comprehensive information is available, but information retrieval becomes inefficient without ranking and prioritization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedecision-making efficiencyVSAvoidinformation access time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing and storing relevance scores for documents and users based on their interaction statistics and access rights. When a user needs to access shared documents, the system can immediately present them in ranked order without requiring real-time computation. This preliminary ranking action significantly reduces information access time while maintaining comprehensive document availability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the presentation parameter from equal-weighted document lists to relevance-ranked lists based on computed scores. This parameter change allows users to quickly access the most relevant documents first, improving decision-making efficiency by reducing the time needed to filter through comprehensive document collections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If the system ranks documents and users based on interaction data, then relevant information is prioritized, but the complexity of computing and managing ranks increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance measurement accuracyVSAvoidranking system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the ranking computation into separate components: document ranking based on document-specific interaction data and user ranking based on user-specific interaction data. Each ranking can be computed and updated independently, reducing the overall complexity of the ranking system while maintaining precise relevance measurement through specialized algorithms for each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from interaction statistics to continuously refine ranking algorithms. By collecting data on user behaviors (views, downloads, edits, shares) and using this feedback to adjust relevance scores, the system improves measurement precision over time. The feedback mechanism also helps identify patterns that simplify the ranking computation while maintaining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10678797B2Ranking of shared documents and users
Publication Date: 2020.06.09 SAP SE
  • US10678797B2 patent drawing
  • US10678797B2 patent drawing
  • US10678797B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Collaboration application includes a set of shared documents shared with users with different authorization rights. A request to provide relevant shared documents from the set of shared documents is received. Document ranks corresponding to the relevant shared documents are determined. The document ranks are determined based on weighted document factors related to the set of shared documents. A ranked list of the relevant shared documents is provided according to the determined document ranks. User rank for users in relation to a document from the relevant shared documents is determined. The user ranks are determined based on user factors and weights of the user factors. The user factors are related to authorization rights of the users to the document, sharing characteristics of the document and the users, and measurements over interactions of the users with documents from the set of shared documents that are shared with the users.