Retractable Dock Barrier Powered Latching Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Loading dock safety systems fail to effectively prevent accidents by ensuring the retractable barrier remains deployed when a truck is not present and the dock door is open, leading to potential hazards from falling edges and unauthorized vehicle movement.

Innovation Solution

A safety system that includes sensors to monitor the position of the dock door and vehicle, a powered latching mechanism to control the retractable barrier, and an alarm system to alert of imminent dangers, ensuring the barrier remains locked when the vehicle is not at the target parking spot and the door is open, and the vehicle restraint is engaged.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If the retractable barrier is made manually operable without automated control, then the device complexity is reduced, but the reliability of preventing accidents when vehicles are absent deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebarrier control systemVSAvoidaccident prevention
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system automatically responds to sensor detections without requiring manual intervention. When sensors detect that a vehicle is absent and the dock door is open, the system self-activates to lock the barrier in the deployed position, eliminating the need for continuous manual monitoring while maintaining high reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor vehicle presence and door status, providing feedback to the controller. This feedback loop enables the barrier control system to automatically adjust its state based on real-time conditions, ensuring reliable accident prevention without requiring complex manual control mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the barrier is automatically locked when vehicle is absent and door is open, then the safety reliability is improved, but the device complexity increases due to additional sensors and control mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccident preventionVSAvoidsafety control system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety system is divided into independent functional modules: vehicle presence sensors, door status sensors, a control unit, and the barrier mechanism itself. This segmentation allows each component to perform its specific function with simple, well-defined logic, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining high reliability through modular design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessments by continuously monitoring vehicle presence and door status before triggering the barrier locking action. This preliminary detection phase allows the system to prepare and respond automatically only when necessary conditions are met, avoiding unnecessary complexity in constant active control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If the barrier remains deployed when vehicle is not present, then the protection against falling hazards is improved, but the ease of operation for authorized personnel deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalling hazard protectionVSAvoidbarrier access
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The barrier system dynamically adjusts its state between deployed and retracted positions based on real-time sensor input. When a vehicle is present and the dock door is open, the barrier automatically retracts to allow easy access for authorized personnel. When the vehicle is absent and the door is open, the barrier deploys to prevent falling hazards, thus adapting to operational needs without compromising safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2660170B1Safety barrier systems for loading docks
Publication Date: 2014.12.24 RITE HITE HLDG CORP
  • EP2660170B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2660170B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP2660170B1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

Example safety barrier systems (10) for vehicle loading docks (12) comprise a retractable flexible barrier (40) with a special powered latching mechanism (50)that locks the barrier in place and prevents it from being retracted under certain hazardous dock conditions. In some examples, the barrier cannot be retracted when there is no vehicle at the dock while the dock's door (16) is open. In some examples, an alarm (54) is energized when concurrently the door is open, the barrier is retracted and there is no vehicle at the dock.