Dock Leveler Deck Obstruction Safety Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing dock levelers lack a safe and secure mechanism for maintaining, cleaning, or servicing the pit area underneath the deck, as they often require the deck to be raised, posing safety risks without proper bracing.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of deck and lip obstructions that can be manually actuated to secure the dock leveler in a raised or extended position, providing safe access to the underside by deploying obstructions that extend visibly beyond the deck sides, offering a backup support mechanism independent of power actuators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the deck is raised to access mechanisms for maintenance, then accessibility for service operations is improved, but safety deteriorates due to risk of deck movement

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccessibility for maintenanceVSAvoidsafety during service
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by deploying obstructions (deck obstructions and lip obstructions) before workers access the pit area. The obstructions are positioned to prevent deck movement in advance, ensuring safety is established before maintenance activities begin. The system requires the obstructions to be in place before the deck can be raised or held in a service position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses obstructions as intermediary elements between the deck and the pit area. These obstructions act as a mediator that physically blocks the deck from moving downward, transferring the safety function from an active braking system to a passive mechanical barrier that workers can rely on during maintenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If power actuators are used to hold the deck in position, then positioning accuracy is improved, but operational safety deteriorates due to dependency on powered systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidsafety independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies self-service by designing a system where the obstructions serve their own safety function without requiring external power sources. The obstructions are mechanically self-contained, using the deck's own weight and the obstruction structure to maintain positioning, eliminating dependency on powered systems for safety during maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by providing a backup mechanical support system (obstructions) that is in place before power failure can occur. This passive mechanical system acts as a safety cushion that prevents catastrophic deck movement even if powered actuators fail, ensuring continuous safety protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If obstructions extend visibly beyond deck sides, then safety awareness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety awarenessVSAvoidobstruction structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies the principle of visual indication by requiring obstructions to extend visibly beyond the deck sides when deployed. This creates a clear visual signal to workers that the safety system is active and the deck is secured, improving safety awareness through visual feedback without requiring additional lighting or electronic indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #32Color changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution ensures safe working conditions by preventing the deck and lip from moving during maintenance, allowing workers to access the underside safely and maintaining the dock leveler in a service configuration without relying on power actuators, thus enhancing safety and operational efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

urging, via a spring, the deck obstruction laterally against the side wall of the pit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

supporting at least a portion of the deck's weight via engagement between the deck obstruction and the platform

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravitation: Gravitation

Data Source

PatentEP3031757B1Dock leveler safety supports
Publication Date: 2017.09.20 RITE HITE HLDG CORP
  • EP3031757B1 patent drawingFigure 1~3
  • EP3031757B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5
  • EP3031757B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

Dock leveler safety supports are disclosed. An example dock leveler (18) includes a deck (16) movable relative to a platform (10) between a raised position and a lowered cross-traffic position when the dock leveler is in a working configuration, where a first lateral edge (25) and a second lateral edge (25) of the deck are proximate the platform when the deck is in the lowered cross-traffic position and the deck residing at least partially in a pit when the front edge (20) of the deck is in the lowered cross-traffic position. A front edge of the deck is above at least one of the lowered cross-traffic position or the raised position and inhibited from descending toward the lowered cross-traffic position when the dock leveler is in a service configuration. A first deck obstruction (38) is movable relative to a deck between a secured position and an unrestrained position, where the first deck obstruction in the secured position configures the dock leveler in the service configuration and the first deck obstruction in the unrestrained position configures the dock leveler in the working configuration. The first deck obstruction extends farther beyond the outer perimeter of the deck when the first deck obstruction is in the secured position than when the first deck obstruction is in the unrestrained position.