Dock Leveler Traction Surface Coating

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Dock levelers face challenges such as inadequate weight distribution, high material costs, manufacturing complexities, operational difficulties, traction issues, and malfunctions due to their design and materials, particularly with conical-ended springs and manual operation leading to inefficiencies and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

The dock leveler system incorporates a deck plate with a lip assembly, a pivot anchor, a counterbalancing assembly, a lift lever with a retainer, and a maintenance strut, along with a thermosetting super durable polyester powder coating to enhance friction on traction surfaces, addressing weight distribution, material costs, operational ease, and traction issues.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conical-ended springs are used to facilitate attachment, then attachment is easier, but material costs increase and manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment easeVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the conical end feature from the spring design, extracting the problematic element that caused manufacturing difficulties. The spring is redesigned with a standard cylindrical end that can be attached using conventional methods, eliminating the need for specialized conical machining while maintaining attachment functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs standard, off-the-shelf springs with cylindrical ends rather than custom-manufactured conical springs. This approach uses readily available, cost-effective components that can be attached using simple methods, reducing both material costs and manufacturing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If conical portion is added to spring, then attachment is facilitated, but spring constant varies and decreases across the conical portion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattachment easeVSAvoidspring constant uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies uniform cylindrical geometry throughout the spring design, ensuring consistent material properties and spring constant across the entire spring length. This eliminates the conical portion that caused variable spring constant, providing reliable and uniform mechanical properties from end to end.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If dock leveler is made heavier to handle weight, then weight handling capability improves, but internal impact and static loads increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveweight handling capabilityVSAvoidinternal impact and static loads
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates a counterbalancing assembly with springs that provide an upward lifting force to offset the weight of the dock leveler and the load. This counterbalancing mechanism reduces the net weight that the structure must support, thereby reducing internal impact and static loads while maintaining weight handling capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses dynamic counterbalancing springs that actively adjust to support the weight during operation, transforming a static load-bearing problem into a dynamic force-balancing system. This reduces the peak stresses and internal loads experienced by the dock leveler structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Ease of operation

If manual operation is used, then operational flexibility improves, but burring and sharp edges occur at interaction points

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational flexibilityVSAvoidburring and sharp edges
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a powder coating treatment to the surfaces where manual operation occurs. This coating changes the surface parameters by providing a smooth, burr-free finish with appropriate friction characteristics, eliminating sharp edges while maintaining operational flexibility and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

5Ease of operation

If traction surface is made smooth for easy movement, then movement ease improves, but friction decreases causing safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement easeVSAvoidslipping and safety issues
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies a powder coating to the traction surfaces that optimizes the coefficient of friction. This coating provides sufficient grip to prevent slipping during loading and unloading operations while maintaining a relatively smooth surface that allows for easy movement of equipment and materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides structural rigidity, reduces material costs, simplifies manufacturing, improves operational safety, enhances traction, and reduces malfunctions, ensuring reliable and efficient loading and unloading operations across various environmental conditions.

Implementation Method 1

a thermosetting super durable polyester powder coating to enhance friction on traction surfaces

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20240409342A1Dock leveler with increased traction
Publication Date: 2024.12.12 OVERHEAD DOOR CORP
  • US20240409342A1 patent drawing
  • US20240409342A1 patent drawing
  • US20240409342A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for increasing friction on a traction surface of a deck plate or a lip plate of a dock leveler comprises pre-treating the traction surface of the deck plate or the lip plate of the dock leveler, the traction surface having a first lower coefficient of friction. The method further comprises applying a coating to the traction surface of the deck plate or the lip plate of the dock leveler. The coating is a thermosetting super durable polyester powder coating comprising friction-increasing particles, the friction-increasing particles being applied as a part of the powder coating to the dock leveler. The method further comprises curing the coating on the traction surface of the deck plate or the lip plate of the dock leveler to increase friction on the traction surface of the deck plate or the lip plate to a second higher coefficient of friction.