Dock Restraint Hook Assembly for Motor-Free RIG Bar Locking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional vehicle restraints for trailers at loading docks face issues such as hook pinch and reliance on motors, which are costly, complex, and unreliable, especially during power outages, and often require manual intervention for disengagement.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle restraint system utilizing a vertical and horizontal slide assembly with biasing mechanisms and a locking assembly that operates without motors, allowing for secure engagement and disengagement of the RIG bar based on the vehicle's motion, using springs and hydraulic components for biasing and locking.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If motorized mechanisms are used for vehicle restraint systems, then automation and ease of operation are improved, but device complexity, cost, and reliability during power outages worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system is designed to automatically engage and disengage without requiring external power or manual intervention. The spring-loaded carriage self-actuates through the vehicle's own backward movement, and the hydraulic cylinder automatically releases the latch when the vehicle pulls forward, making the system self-serving and eliminating motors entirely

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces motorized actuation systems with a purely mechanical spring-loaded carriage system that uses the vehicle's movement to trigger engagement and disengagement. The hydraulic cylinder provides automatic latch release without requiring electrical power, substituting mechanical and hydraulic systems for electrical motors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Extent of automation

If motorized mechanisms are used for vehicle restraint systems, then automation is improved, but reliability during power outages worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveextent of automationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically engages when the vehicle backs up and automatically disengages when the vehicle pulls forward, using the vehicle's own motion to trigger the restraint actions without requiring external power sources or control systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

A hydraulic cylinder replaces motorized actuation for the latch mechanism, providing reliable automatic engagement and disengagement that is not dependent on electrical power. The hydraulic system uses fluid pressure to actuate the latch, ensuring operation during power outages

Inventive Principle:
Principle #29Pneumatics and hydraulics

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional restraints engage the RIG bar with fixed positioning, then ease of manufacture is improved, but adaptability to different vehicle heights worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoidadaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The restraint system incorporates a vertically movable carriage that adjusts its position based on the vehicle's RIG bar height. The carriage travels along vertical tracks and can be positioned at different heights, allowing the system to adapt to various vehicle types and heights while maintaining a straightforward mechanical design

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides reliable, efficient, and cost-effective restraint without power requirements, eliminating hook pinch and reducing operational complexity by using mechanical interactions to secure and release the RIG bar, enhancing safety and ease of use.

Implementation Method 1

A vertical biasing assembly may be provided to bias the vertical slide frame toward the resting height

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 2

A horizontal biasing assembly may be provided to bias the horizontal slide frame away from the dock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring force: Spring

Implementation Method 3

A hydraulic cylinder assembly may be provided with a solenoid valve, a lock piston and a return spring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHydraulic pressure: Hydraulic Press

Data Source

PatentUS12503324B2Vehicle restraint
Publication Date: 2025.12.23 ASSA ABLOY ENTRANCE SYST AB
  • US12503324B2 patent drawing
  • US12503324B2 patent drawing
  • US12503324B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A restraining assembly for a vehicle restraint for restraining a rear impact guard (RIG) bar of a vehicle or trailer at a dock may include a hook. The hook may further include a locking arm at a first end thereof, a catch portion at a second end thereof, an axial orifice about which the hook rotates responsive to movement of the RIG bar in contact with the catch portion or the locking arm, and a cam surface disposed between the locking arm and the axial orifice. The hook may be rotatably mounted to a vertical slide assembly of the vehicle restraint that slidably engages the RIG bar to adjust to a height of the RIG bar against a bias applied to the vertical slide assembly. The restraining assembly may be rotated only responsive to movement of the RIG bar to transition between a receiving position for receiving or releasing the RIG bar and a locking position for retaining the RIG bar.