Spacecraft Docking Buffer Mechanism for Precision Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing spacecraft docking systems are complex, with high inertia and reduced buffering efficiency due to numerous components, and require high-precision force sensors that can cause oscillations and increase manufacturing costs.

Innovation Solution

A spacecraft docking system comprising an active docking device with three sets of buffer mechanisms, each including a main buffer and self-difference buffer, which eliminates the need for force sensors by using screw nut assemblies and a control device to achieve precise alignment and rigid connection without Stewart platform operations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If a motor drive mechanism with transmission gears is used to achieve active docking, then the docking precision is improved, but the device complexity and weight increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking precisionVSAvoidtransmission chain complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the traditional motor drive mechanism with transmission gears with a buffer mechanism comprising three sets of buffer assemblies. Each buffer assembly includes a buffer rod, buffer spring, and damping component that work together to provide active docking capability through controlled mechanical buffering rather than complex gear transmission, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining docking precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer mechanism is segmented into three independent buffer assemblies, each handling specific directional buffering requirements. This segmentation allows the system to achieve complex docking motions through coordinated simple components rather than a single complex transmission system, reducing overall device complexity while maintaining precision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of operation

If numerous transmission gears are used in the docking system, then the docking control is improved, but the system inertia increases and buffering efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking controlVSAvoidbuffering efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the gear transmission system with a direct buffer mechanism where buffer rods connect docking rings through buffer springs and damping components. This eliminates the energy losses associated with gear meshing and transmission, directly transferring and controlling docking forces while maintaining precise control capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The buffer springs are pre-compressed or pre-positioned to provide immediate buffering capability upon docking contact. This beforehand cushioning allows the system to absorb impact energy efficiently without the delays and losses associated with mechanical transmission through multiple gears, improving both control responsiveness and buffering efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Manufacturing precision

If high-precision force sensors are used for closed-loop control, then the docking precision is improved, but the manufacturing cost increases and system instability may occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocking precisionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The buffer mechanism is designed to provide inherent feedback through the mechanical properties of buffer springs and damping components. The system uses its own structural deformation and force characteristics to regulate docking motions, eliminating the need for external high-precision force sensors while maintaining docking precision and reducing manufacturing costs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements passive mechanical feedback through the buffer spring-damper system, where the mechanical elements themselves provide force feedback proportional to compression and velocity. This intrinsic feedback mechanism replaces expensive electronic sensors and achieves stable closed-loop control without the risk of sensor drift or oscillations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Extent of automation

If a complex motor drive mechanism is used, then the active docking capability is improved, but the system weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactive docking capabilityVSAvoiddocking system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces heavy motor drive mechanisms with a lighter buffer mechanism consisting of buffer rods, springs, and damping components. This mechanical substitution maintains active docking capability through controlled buffer deployment and retraction while significantly reducing the weight of the docking system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively buffers collision loads, allows for flexible docking and undocking with varying quality targets, and simplifies the docking process with existing manned spacecraft, offering improved reliability, weight reduction, and economic benefits.

Implementation Method 1

The buffer mechanism includes a spring component that compresses during impact to absorb kinetic energy

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring compression: Spring

Implementation Method 2

The buffer mechanism includes a damping component that dissipates vibrational energy during the docking process

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDamping: Damping

Implementation Method 3

The active docking device includes a screw nut assembly that converts rotational adjustment to linear positioning of the docking ring

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectScrew mechanism: Screw

Data Source

PatentUS11053031B2Spacecraft docking system and method
Publication Date: 2021.07.06 SHANGHAI AEROSPACE SYST ENG INST
  • US11053031B2 patent drawing
  • US11053031B2 patent drawing
  • US11053031B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A spacecraft docking system and method thereof are provided. The system comprises an active docking device and a passive docking device. The active docking device comprises an active docking ring and a docking frame. The active docking device further comprises three sets of buffer mechanisms, each set of the buffer mechanisms comprises a main buffer, two screw nut assemblies, and a self-difference buffer. An upper end and a lower end of the screw nut assembly are movably connected to the active docking ring and the docking frame, respectively. The two screw nut assemblies in each set are simultaneously driven and stretched by the main buffer, being also connected to each other through the self-difference buffer, and able to be relatively adjusted and stretched through the self-difference buffer.