Docking Trash Can for Automated Robotic Vacuum System and Method

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic vacuum docking stations occupy significant space and require manual emptying of vacuumed debris, lacking an integrated solution for both charging and trash disposal.

Innovation Solution

A combined system that integrates a robotic vacuum docking station with a trash can, featuring a suction mechanism to automatically empty vacuumed debris from the robotic vacuum into the trash can, while also charging the vacuum.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Area of stationary object

If a docking station is integrated with a trash can, then space utilization is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace occupied by docking station and trash canVSAvoidcomplexity of integrated system
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines a docking station and trash can into a single integrated unit. The docking station includes a base with a receiving station for the robotic vacuum and a trash can positioned adjacent to it. This merging eliminates the need for separate docking station and trash can units, directly resolving the space utilization issue while managing complexity through functional integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated unit serves multiple functions: charging the robotic vacuum, emptying the vacuum's collector, and providing trash disposal. The base functions as both a docking station for charging and a platform supporting the trash can with automated emptying capability. This multi-functionality addresses the space constraint by consolidating what would traditionally require separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If automated debris disposal is implemented, then ease of operation is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of emptying vacuumed debrisVSAvoidcomplexity of automated emptying mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the robotic vacuum to automatically empty its own collector by docking with the base. The vacuum's collector is positioned to engage with the trash can, and a door mechanism automatically opens to allow debris transfer. This self-service capability eliminates manual emptying while managing complexity through automated sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The base acts as an intermediary between the robotic vacuum and the trash can. It provides the docking interface, controls the door mechanism, and manages the debris transfer process. This intermediary role simplifies the overall system by centralizing control functions in the base rather than requiring complex mechanisms in the vacuum itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If a dedicated bin is used for limited period storage, then productivity is improved, but volume of trash containment is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefrequency of vacuum emptyingVSAvoidvolume of trash can
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts between two operational modes: the robotic vacuum can empty its collector frequently into the trash can for small debris amounts, or the trash can can be manually emptied when larger volumes accumulate. This dynamic approach optimizes productivity by allowing frequent automated emptying while providing manual intervention capability for larger trash volumes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The trash management system is segmented into automated and manual components. The automated portion handles frequent, small-volume debris transfer from the vacuum collector to the trash can. The manual portion allows users to empty the trash can when needed. This segmentation enables the system to handle varying debris volumes efficiently without requiring a constantly large trash can capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution provides space-saving and automated debris disposal, enhancing the efficiency of cleaning environments by integrating trash management and vacuum charging within a single unit.

Implementation Method 1

a vacuum motor connected to the suction inlet, a duct connected to the vacuum motor, and an outlet connected to the duct

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSuction: Pressure Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS20240074634A1Docking Trash Can for Automated Robotic Vacuum System and Method
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 EYEVAC LLC
  • US20240074634A1 patent drawing
  • US20240074634A1 patent drawing
  • US20240074634A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes a trash can combined as a unit with a robotic vacuum docking station. The trash can has a lid that is opened to deposit or empty trash in the trash can and otherwise closed to contain the trash. The docking station includes an inlet for receiving a robotic vacuum. The system can include a vacuum motor for carrying vacuumed debris from the robotic vacuum to a bin. The bin can be a canister segregated from the trash can bin or can be the trash can bin itself. The docking station can charge the robotic vacuum.