Document Authenticity Detection with QR-Encoded Content

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The reliance on paper and electronic documents is hindered by the ease of altering them without detectable anti-counterfeiting elements, and verifying authenticity often requires cumbersome manual processes.

Innovation Solution

Documents are generated with a unique indicium, including encoded graphical elements like QR codes, which encode document content and metadata, allowing automated verification of authenticity by matching encoded and decoded information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional paper or electronic documents are used without anti-counterfeiting elements, then ease of manufacture and operation are improved, but reliability and security deteriorate as documents can be easily altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument authenticityVSAvoiddocument structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent embeds multiple layers of verification within the document structure: a visible indicium containing encoded data, hidden machine-readable codes, and cryptographic hash values nested within the document metadata. This nested structure allows authenticating information to be contained within the document itself without requiring external verification systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a digital copy or representation of the document's critical information in the form of encoded indicia and hash values. These copied representations are embedded within the document structure, allowing verification through comparison without needing to contact the original issuing authority.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual verification processes are used to confirm document authenticity, then reliability is improved, but loss of time and operational efficiency worsen due to cumbersome verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthenticity verificationVSAvoidverification time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary encoding and hashing of the document content during the document creation process. The indicium and verification data are pre-calculated and embedded into the document structure before issuance, enabling immediate verification without requiring time-consuming manual checks or external database queries at the time of validation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The document contains all necessary verification information within its own structure through embedded indicia, encoded data, and cryptographic hashes. This self-contained verification capability allows the document to prove its own authenticity without requiring external services or manual intervention from issuing authorities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If anti-counterfeiting elements are added to documents, then reliability is improved, but ease of manufacture deteriorates due to additional processing steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument securityVSAvoiddocument creation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex physical anti-counterfeiting elements (such as holograms, special inks, or security threads) with digital/cryptographic mechanisms. Instead of requiring specialized manufacturing equipment for physical security features, the system uses software-based encoding, hashing, and data embedding that can be implemented through standard document processing systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the document from a static information carrier into a data structure with multiple encoded parameters and layers. By changing the document's fundamental parameters to include embedded indicia, hidden codes, and cryptographic elements, the system achieves enhanced security while the encoding processes can be automated through software, maintaining ease of manufacture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If existing anti-counterfeiting elements like holograms are used, then reliability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase, and these elements can still be copied

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecounterfeiting resistanceVSAvoidverification system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent moves the security verification from the physical dimension (examining holograms, watermarks, or tactile features) to the digital/data dimension. By encoding verification information in machine-readable formats and cryptographic structures that exist in a different dimensional space, the system enables automated verification through data processing rather than physical inspection, reducing complexity while improving counterfeiting resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS20250286722A1System and methods for detecting altered documents
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US20250286722A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286722A1 patent drawing
  • US20250286722A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Many documents, whether hardcopy or softcopy, require authentication for a particular use. Documents are often copied but knowing whether the contents of a document, even a copy of the document, have been altered can still be critical to the particular use. In one embodiment, a document's content is encoded with a symbolic representation, such as one or more Quick Response (QR) codes, derived from the document's content. Subsequent scanning of the document retrieves the document's content and the symbolic representation. The retrieved document's contents are then used to generate a symbolic representation of the content and compared to the content encoded in the symbolic representation. If the two match, the document has not been altered.