Integrated Document Batching and Random Sampling for Review Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current document review processes face challenges in maintaining quality control and reducing error rates due to the complexity of batching and random sampling, especially when documents are repeatedly output and returned, making it difficult to implement robust quality control within the review system.

Innovation Solution

The system integrates batching and random sampling by receiving a batching request with a population size and acceptable margin of error, calculating a random sample size, selecting a subset of documents, grouping them into batches, and assigning these batches to review nodes, all within a single application, utilizing a processor and modules for query, analysis, batching, communication, and statistical evaluation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If documents are repeatedly output and returned for review, then review completeness is improved, but error rates increase and quality control becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview completenessVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary random sampling and batch assignment before the actual review process begins. By pre-calculating sample sizes based on population characteristics and margin of error requirements, the system establishes a statistically sound framework that prevents errors from propagating through repeated review cycles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where review results are statistically evaluated against the random sample to validate overall review quality. This allows the system to monitor and control error rates across multiple review iterations without requiring complete re-review of all documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If random sampling is implemented externally, then sampling flexibility is improved, but integration with review system and quality control deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesampling flexibilityVSAvoidsystem integration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the random sampling function with the document review system into a unified integrated system. The sampling module, batching module, and review modules communicate through standardized interfaces within the same system architecture, eliminating the need for external sampling tools and manual data transfer while maintaining statistical rigor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Productivity

If batch size is increased to improve efficiency, then productivity is improved, but quality control and error detection worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview efficiencyVSAvoidquality control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by using random sampling to review only a statistically sufficient subset of documents rather than all documents. The sample size is calculated to provide adequate quality control and error detection capability while reviewing fewer documents than the full population, thus maintaining both productivity and quality control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9785634B2Integration and combination of random sampling and document batching
Publication Date: 2017.10.10 OPEN TEXT CORPORATION
  • US9785634B2 patent drawing
  • US9785634B2 patent drawing
  • US9785634B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems of integrated batching and random sampling of documents for enhanced functionality and quality control, such as validation, within a document review process are provided herein. According to various embodiments, a batching request may be received and may include a population size that corresponds to a total amount of documents available for sampling. The batching request may also include an acceptable margin of error. A random sample size may be calculated based on the batching request, and then a subset of documents corresponding to the random sample size may be selected from the total amount of documents available for sampling. The subset of documents may be grouped into one or more batches, and the one or more batches may be assigned to one or more review nodes.