Document Collection Change Tracking via Indicator Values

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In the realm of electronic documents, it is challenging to determine the extent of changes in a collection since it was declared as a record, as additional documents can be added or removed, making it difficult to track the provenance and lineage of the content.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that associate an indicator with the collection of documents, adjusting its value based on changes such as additions or removals, providing a provenance value indicating the original content and a lineage value indicating authorship changes, allowing for tracking of changes over time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If additional documents are added to a case after it is declared as a record, then the case can be updated with new information, but the provenance and integrity of the original record becomes uncertain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to add documents to caseVSAvoidprovenance of record
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document collection into original records and subsequent additions by creating distinct indicator values. The indicator system separates the provenance tracking of the original record from modifications, allowing the original record's integrity to be preserved and distinguished from later additions. This segmentation enables the system to maintain reliability of the original record while still allowing adaptability through controlled additions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary indicator mechanism that mediates between the original record and any subsequent additions. This indicator acts as a mediator that tracks and communicates the status of document additions without directly altering the original record's provenance. The indicator serves as an intermediate layer that preserves the distinction between original content and modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If traditional record rules are applied to complex document collections, then record integrity is maintained, but the system cannot accommodate flexible document additions and modifications

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverecord integrityVSAvoidflexibility to modify collection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the record system adaptable through the indicator mechanism. The indicator can dynamically reflect the current state of the document collection, transitioning from indicating no changes to indicating specific types of changes. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain record integrity while accommodating flexible modifications, as the indicator adapts to reflect the evolving state without compromising the original record's provenance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If no tracking mechanism is implemented, then the system is simple and easy to operate, but it cannot determine the extent of changes to the document collection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of systemVSAvoidchange tracking information
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a self-service tracking mechanism where the indicator automatically reflects the state of the document collection without requiring complex external monitoring systems. The indicator serves itself by inherently capturing change information through its value adjustments, providing change tracking in a simple and automated manner that maintains ease of operation while preventing loss of change information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If an indicator system is implemented to track changes, then change detection capability is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechange detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the change tracking function into a separate, dedicated indicator mechanism rather than embedding complex tracking logic throughout the entire system. By taking out the measurement function and isolating it in the indicator, the system achieves precise change detection while minimizing overall system complexity. The indicator serves as a dedicated measurement component that can be implemented independently from the core document management functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9418065B2Tracking changes related to a collection of documents
Publication Date: 2016.08.16 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US9418065B2 patent drawing
  • US9418065B2 patent drawing
  • US9418065B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Changes to a collection of documents are tracked by generating content information for the collection of documents identifying initial content within the collection of documents and assigning an indicator a value indicating absence of changes to the collection of documents. A change to the collection of documents is detected and the value of the indicator is adjusted in accordance with the detected change to indicate an amount of the initial content within the modified collection of documents.