Shared Document Context Matching for Missed Meeting Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Users collaborating on shared documents may miss important contextual information due to absence during meetings, leading to challenges in seamless collaboration.

Innovation Solution

A document collaboration program that identifies a shared document, initiates a live meeting, and matches verbal content to changes in the document, providing contextual information to users.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If users are absent during live meetings, then they can focus on other tasks, but they miss important contextual information about document changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser task completionVSAvoidcontextual information
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a copy of the contextual information from the live meeting and attaches it to the shared document. This allows users to access the contextual information later without needing to attend the live meeting, resolving the contradiction between productivity (skipping the meeting) and information completeness (needing the context).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the live meeting content and document changes during the meeting itself, so that when users review the document later, the contextual information is already prepared and attached. This eliminates the need for users to be present during the meeting while ensuring they receive complete context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If users attend all live meetings to ensure they have complete contextual information, then information completeness is maintained, but productivity decreases due to time spent in meetings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual informationVSAvoiduser task completion
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of requiring users to physically attend meetings, the system copies the essential contextual information from the meeting and attaches it to the document. Users can review this copied context at their convenience, maintaining information completeness while freeing up time for other tasks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system acts as an intermediary between the live meeting and the user. It captures the contextual information during the meeting, processes it, and delivers it to users asynchronously. This intermediary role eliminates the need for users to be present at meetings while ensuring they receive the necessary context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of information

If the system provides detailed contextual information for all document changes, then information completeness is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontextual informationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the relevant contextual information from the live meeting that is directly related to document changes. Instead of capturing and processing all meeting content, it selectively extracts portions that provide context for specific document modifications, reducing system complexity while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of contextual information to different parts of the document based on local needs. Each document change receives contextual information specific to that change rather than a uniform approach, optimizing the balance between information completeness and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Measurement precision

If the system matches verbal content to document changes in real-time, then information accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematching accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs the matching of verbal content to document changes during the live meeting itself, while the context is still fresh and easily identifiable. This preliminary matching action ensures high accuracy while the processing is done efficiently during the natural flow of the meeting, rather than requiring extensive post-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from the document collaboration program about what changes are being made to guide the matching process. This feedback mechanism helps the system quickly identify which verbal content is relevant to which document changes, improving matching accuracy while reducing the time needed for analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12549670B2Providing context for collaborative document
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12549670B2 patent drawing
  • US12549670B2 patent drawing

AI summary

According to one embodiment, a method, computer system, and computer program product for providing context regarding a shared document is provided. The embodiment may include identifying a shared document. The embodiment may also include initiating a live meeting. The embodiment may further include identifying verbal content in the live meeting. The embodiment may also include identifying one or more changes to the shared document. The embodiment may further include matching a portion of verbal content to a relevant change in the one or more changes to the shared document. The embodiment may also include providing contextual information to a user based on the matching.