Document Cover Closer Preventing Center Folding via Rotation Resistance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional document cover closers often experience center folding phenomena during normal closing operations, especially with thick documents, and require increased lift operation force to prevent this, which also increases the maximum lift state force.

Innovation Solution

A document cover closer with a pressurizing contact mechanism between the supporting and spring receiving members, featuring first and second pressing portions arranged in parallel, and a rotation resisting mechanism that provides resistance to reverse rotation of the lift member relative to the supporting member, reducing the operation force needed and preventing center folding.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If increased lift operation force is applied to prevent center folding, then center folding prevention is improved, but maximum lift state force increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter folding preventionVSAvoidmaximum lift state force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing portions are positioned specifically at the pressing position on the supporting member, creating localized resistance only where needed to prevent center folding. This localized quality change allows prevention of the harmful folding phenomenon without requiring increased force throughout the entire lifting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The pressing portions apply preliminary resistance to the lift member at the pressing position before center folding can occur. By providing this preliminary anti-action during the lifting operation, the mechanism prevents the harmful folding effect from developing, thereby improving reliability without requiring excessive maximum force.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

2Reliability

If pressing portions are added to prevent center folding, then center folding prevention is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecenter folding preventionVSAvoidstructure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The pressing portions are integrated into the supporting member structure, merging the center folding prevention function with the existing supporting framework. This integration allows the mechanism to prevent center folding without adding separate, complex components, thereby maintaining structural simplicity while improving reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The supporting member with pressing portions serves dual functions: it provides structural support and simultaneously prevents center folding through the pressing portions. This self-service approach eliminates the need for additional dedicated components, reducing device complexity while achieving the reliability improvement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively prevents center folding of the document cover during normal opening and closing operations while reducing the operation force required, except at the start of the operation, ensuring stable document coverage and preventing sudden document cover jumps.

Implementation Method 1

an elastic member rotationally urging the lift member in a direction in which the latter moves to overlap the supporting member 31, while urging the supporting member 31 at least in an opening direction of the document cover K

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

a cam slider 41 slidably housed in the supporting member, with its cam portion 41a abutting against the pressed member 40

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCam mechanism: Cam

Implementation Method 3

the both side plates 31b being coupled via a hinge shaft 32 to the both side plates 30b of the attaching member 30

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Implementation Method 4

its both side plates being pivotally attached via a coupling shaft to be rotatable in a direction different from that of the supporting member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPivot attachment: Axle

Data Source

PatentUS11802431B2Document cover closer and office equipment using the same
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 KEM HONGKONG LTD
  • US11802431B2 patent drawing
  • US11802431B2 patent drawing
  • US11802431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A document cover closer and office equipment using the same are disclosed. The document cover closer includes an attaching part, which includes an attaching base and two side plates. The attaching part is attached to a main body. A supporting part includes a back plate and two side plates. The side plates of the supporting part are rotatably coupled via a hinge shaft to the side plates of the attaching part. A lift part includes a back plate and two side plates. The side plates of the lift part are pivotally attached via a coupling shaft to the free end side of the side plates of the supporting member. An actuating part is provided on the pivotally attaching portion of the lift part so as to rotate about the coupling shaft when the lift part rotates.