Automated Document Data Extraction and Template Filling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual review of complex documents for client applications is costly and inefficient, requiring significant human resources and being difficult to automate in businesses processing loan applications and similar services.

Innovation Solution

A natural language system utilizing NLP and machine learning to proactively extract data from documents, generate normalized entries, and fill document templates, while securely managing sensitive data based on user prompts and security tiers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review of documents is performed, then data extraction accuracy is maintained, but labor cost and time consumption increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata extraction accuracyVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data extraction and template filling automatically before human review. The machine learning model extracts data entries from documents and fills document templates proactively, so that when human reviewers receive the documents, the majority of data extraction work is already completed, reducing their time consumption while maintaining accuracy through human verification of critical items

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary automated processing layer between document receipt and human review. This intermediary system includes the machine learning model that extracts data, normalizes entries, and fills templates, acting as a mediator that prepares documents for human reviewers, thereby reducing the burden on human workers while maintaining quality through the collaborative human-AI workflow

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If manual document review is used, then verification reliability is maintained, but operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification reliabilityVSAvoidoperational efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service automated data extraction and template filling using machine learning models. The system processes documents independently without requiring continuous human intervention, extracting data entries, normalizing them, and filling templates automatically. This self-service capability dramatically improves operational efficiency while verification reliability is maintained through human oversight of critical decisions and the ability to request corrections when confidence is low

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated data extraction is implemented, then processing speed increases, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the document processing task into distinct functional modules: document receipt, data entry extraction using machine learning, data normalization, template filling, and verification. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently and simplifies the overall system architecture by breaking down the complex automation process into manageable, sequential steps that can be implemented and maintained more easily

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Ease of operation

If sensitive data is handled without security tiers, then data accessibility is improved, but data security deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accessibilityVSAvoiddata security risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by implementing different security access levels for different types of sensitive data. Not all data is treated uniformly; instead, data is categorized into security tiers (e.g., public, internal, confidential) and access rights are selectively applied based on the sensitivity level. This allows appropriate data accessibility for operational needs while maintaining strong security protections for highly sensitive information, balancing ease of operation with security requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240346242A1Systems and methods for proactively extracting data from complex documents
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 CAPITAL ONE SERVICES LLC
  • US20240346242A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346242A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346242A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for proactively extracting data from complex documents is disclosed. The system may include one or more processors, an NLP device, a trained machine learning device, and a memory in communication with the one or more processors and storing instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors, are configured to cause the system to, receive one or more documents from a client device, extract one or more extractable data entries from the one or more data entries, generate, one or more normalized data entries, and proactively generate and add one or more completed data entries in place of one or more placeholders in a first document template. The system may receive a natural language prompt from a user device and determine a machine-readable semantic representation. The system may identify sensitive data entries and generate a graphical user interface identifying completed data entries and associated confidence intervals.