Document Editing Notification System for Offline Change Transparency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In collaborative document editing, existing systems lack a mechanism to prompt users for inputting reasons for edits made while other users are not actively editing, potentially leading to unnoticed important changes.

Innovation Solution

An information processing apparatus that includes a reason-for-editing management module, which outputs an indication for users to input the reason for editing when another user edits a document while the first user is not editing, using a reason-for-editing table to store and display the input reason.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a user edits a document while another user is not actively editing, then the editing can be performed without real-time collaboration interference, but the editing changes may be overlooked or unnoticed by other users

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveediting efficiencyVSAvoidloss of editing context
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by detecting editing operations and proactively notifying other users before they open the document, ensuring they are aware of changes made during their absence. This prevents information loss by establishing a notification mechanism that operates before the potential information gap occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by sending notifications to users when their colleagues edit the document, creating a closed-loop communication system. This feedback mechanism ensures that users are informed of changes made while they were not actively editing, preventing them from overlooking important modifications.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system notifies users of all editing operations, then transparency is improved, but notification frequency and user distraction increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransparency of editsVSAvoiduser convenience
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The notification system applies local quality by differentiating between types of users and contexts. It specifically targets users who are not currently editing the document, rather than notifying all users universally. This localized approach maintains transparency for relevant users while avoiding unnecessary notifications to others, thus balancing reliability with ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs partial action by notifying only the subset of users who need to know about the editing - specifically those who are not currently active on the document. This selective notification approach provides sufficient transparency without the excessive action of notifying all possible users, thereby maintaining user convenience.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10318619B2Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and non-transitory computer readable medium
Publication Date: 2019.06.11 FUJIFILM BUSINESS INNOVATION CORP
  • US10318619B2 patent drawing
  • US10318619B2 patent drawing
  • US10318619B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An information processing apparatus including a first indication output unit. The first indication output unit outputs, in a case where a second user edits a document while a first user is not editing the document, an indication for prompting a second user to input a reason for the editing after the second user finishes editing the document.