Document Grouping via Marked Area Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current OCR techniques fail to effectively process printed forms with watermarks, impressions, or low-resolution images, leading to costly manual labor in back offices.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that mark specific areas in electronic documents, match them across multiple documents, compute scores based on matching, and group documents using a processor, reducing manual effort by employing pattern matching and scoring modules.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If OCR techniques are used to process printed forms, then digitization of textual fields is achieved, but processing fails when watermarks, impressions, or low-resolution images are present

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated digitizationVSAvoidprocessing success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document processing into multiple stages: initial OCR attempt, failure detection, template generation from successful cases, and template-based matching for failed cases. This segmentation allows the system to handle different document types and quality levels appropriately, maintaining high automation while improving reliability through fallback mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates templates from successfully processed documents and uses these templates to guide processing of similar documents. By copying the structural patterns from good-quality documents, the system can reliably process documents with watermarks or low resolution, as the template provides a reference framework that compensates for poor image quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If manual labor is used to process documents with OCR failures, then processing accuracy is maintained, but time and money costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing accuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically detecting OCR failures and invoking template-based processing without human intervention. The automated workflow identifies which documents need special handling and processes them through the appropriate pipeline, maintaining accuracy while preserving productivity by eliminating manual intervention for routine cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback loops where processing results are analyzed to identify failures, generate new templates from successful cases, and update the template library. This continuous learning process improves accuracy over time while maintaining automated processing, as the system adapts to new document types and quality variations without requiring manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If template-based processing is implemented, then processing speed and automation are improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing throughputVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing documents to extract templates before the main processing batch. Templates are generated in advance from representative samples and stored for rapid matching during production processing. This preliminary preparation simplifies the main processing pipeline, as documents can be quickly matched against existing templates without requiring complex real-time analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The template library is designed to be dynamic and adaptive, automatically updated with new templates from successfully processed documents. The system dynamically selects which template to use based on document characteristics, and the template collection evolves over time to cover more document variations. This dynamic approach maintains simplicity by using straightforward matching logic while handling increasing document diversity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS9471905B2Methods and systems for processing electronic documents
Publication Date: 2016.10.18 GENESEE VALLEY INNOVATIONS LLC
  • US9471905B2 patent drawing
  • US9471905B2 patent drawing
  • US9471905B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, a system, and a computer program product for processing a plurality of electronic documents are provided. The method includes marking at least one area in an electronic document selected from the plurality of electronic documents. The marked at least one area is then matched with corresponding area in the remaining electronic documents of the plurality of electronic documents. A score is computed for each of the remaining electronic documents of the plurality of electronic documents based on the matching. The plurality of electronic documents is then grouped into one or more groups based on the score.