Electronic Document Browsing via Interest Score Ranking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electronic document browsing methods fail to replicate the experience of physically browsing through a document, as they lack the ability to assess and provide pages that are likely to capture a user's attention, unlike physical books or magazines.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that analyzes and scores content in electronic documents based on user interactions and metadata to determine the interest level of pages, allowing users to browse through ranked candidate pages that are likely to be of interest.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If a fixed number of pages is jumped ahead in an electronic document, then navigation speed is improved, but the browsing experience quality deteriorates because there is no assessment of page interest

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation speedVSAvoidbrowsing experience quality
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores interest scores for all pages in the document before browsing begins. These scores are based on various factors such as content density, image presence, and text analysis. When a user requests to browse forward, the system immediately provides the next interesting page without needing to evaluate pages in real-time, thus maintaining both speed and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical approach of sequentially flipping through pages or jumping fixed numbers of pages with an intelligent system that uses automated scoring and selection algorithms. The system automatically evaluates pages based on pre-established criteria and presents pages in an optimized sequence that simulates natural browsing behavior without manual page-by-page inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If sequential page-by-page browsing is implemented in an electronic document, then browsing experience quality is improved by allowing page assessment, but navigation speed deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebrowsing experience qualityVSAvoidnavigation speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates and stores interest scores for all pages in the document before browsing begins. These scores are based on various factors such as content density, image presence, and text analysis. When a user requests to browse forward, the system immediately provides the next interesting page without needing to evaluate pages in real-time, thus maintaining both speed and quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If traditional electronic document navigation is used, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to replicate physical browsing experience deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidbrowsing experience adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically analyzes document content and assigns interest scores to pages without requiring user input or configuration. The browsing algorithm autonomously determines the sequence of pages to present based on pre-established scoring criteria, making the system adaptable to different document types while maintaining relatively simple device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple parameters to evaluate page interest including content density, image presence, text length, and other document-specific features. By changing and weighing these parameters dynamically based on document type and user behavior patterns, the system achieves high adaptability without requiring complex device architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS9378299B1Browsing pages in an electronic document
Publication Date: 2016.06.28 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9378299B1 patent drawing
  • US9378299B1 patent drawing
  • US9378299B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A user's request for a page to be provided in response to a browse request is fulfilled by determining a candidate set of pages based on the page displayed on the client when the browse request is sent. Scores for those candidate pages are used to rank the candidate pages and a page is provided to the client based on the ranking of the candidate pages.