Document Management System for Automated Clause Updates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional document management systems lack functionality to effectively utilize metadata for improving user interactions with documents, leading to manual tracking of deadlines and inconsistent clause language across multiple documents.

Innovation Solution

A document management system that uses machine learning models to predict renegotiation times for expiring agreements, identifies documents with similar clause language for updating, and suggests actions based on document type, thereby automating tasks and improving document management efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional document management systems are used to track deadlines and manage documents, then basic document storage and viewing functionality is provided, but manual tracking of deadlines and inconsistent clause language across multiple documents occurs, leading to loss of time and reduced productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument management efficiencyVSAvoidmanual tracking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically tracking deadlines, identifying expiring agreements, and notifying users of documents requiring review or updates without requiring manual intervention. The machine learning models autonomously analyze document metadata, clause language, and expiration dates to perform document management tasks independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively identifying documents with upcoming expiration dates before they actually expire, allowing users to take advance action. The system predicts which documents need attention and notifies users in advance, enabling proactive document management rather than reactive responses to missed deadlines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If users manually review and update clause language across multiple documents, then clause consistency can be maintained, but significant time and effort is required, reducing overall productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclause language consistencyVSAvoiddocument update efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual process of reviewing and updating clause language with an automated computational system. Machine learning models analyze document metadata, identify similar clauses across multiple documents, and suggest or implement updates automatically, substituting human manual labor with algorithmic processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring clause language across documents, comparing similarities, and providing notifications when updates are needed. The system creates a feedback loop where document changes are tracked, analyzed, and used to identify subsequent documents that may require similar updates, ensuring ongoing consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Extent of automation

If machine learning models are applied to analyze document metadata and predict user actions, then automated document management suggestions can be provided, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument management automationVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex document management task into distinct functional modules: metadata extraction components, machine learning model components, document analysis components, and user notification components. Each module handles a specific aspect of the automation process, making the overall complex system manageable through functional segmentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses machine learning models as intermediary components that bridge raw document metadata and actionable insights. The ML models serve as mediators that process complex metadata, predict user intentions, and translate this into simplified recommendations or automated actions, shielding users from the underlying system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS20250173380A1Automatic revisions to document clauses based on clause type
Publication Date: 2025.05.29 DOCUSIGN INC
  • US20250173380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250173380A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A document management system can include an artificial intelligence-based document manager that can perform one or more predictive operations based on characteristics of a user, a document, a user account, or historical document activity. For instance, the document management system can apply a machine-learning model to determine how long an expiring agreement document is likely to take to renegotiate and can prompt a user to begin the renegotiation process in advance. The document management system can detect a change to language in a particular clause type and can prompt a user to update other documents that include the clause type to include the change. The document management system can determine a type of a document being worked on and can identify one or more actions that a corresponding user may want to take using a machine-learning model trained on similar documents and similar users.