Document Modification Notification System Using Segmentation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Collaborative document editing processes often struggle to efficiently track and communicate modifications made to specific portions of electronic content, leading to difficulties in maintaining awareness of changes and reducing productivity due to the complexity of managing multiple revisions and notifications.

Innovation Solution

A data processing system that allows users to select specific portions of electronic content, displays relevant modification events, and utilizes machine learning to determine the relevance of modifications, providing users with targeted notifications and summaries of changes in a user-friendly format.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If users are provided with comprehensive notifications of all document modifications, then complete awareness of changes is achieved, but information overload and difficulty in identifying relevant changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveawareness of document changesVSAvoidcomplexity of managing notifications
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments modification notifications by spatial location within the document. Instead of presenting all modifications as a unified list, the system divides notifications into location-specific groups (e.g., modifications in section A, section B, etc.), allowing users to focus on changes in specific areas of interest rather than being overwhelmed by comprehensive but undifferentiated notification lists

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements location-quality differentiation by providing detailed modification information only for selected or relevant portions of the document, while providing summarized or aggregated information for other areas. This allows the notification system to adapt its detail level based on the user's focus area, reducing overall information complexity while maintaining completeness for relevant sections

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Loss of information

If users review all modification events in a document, then complete tracking of changes is achieved, but time and effort required increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking of modificationsVSAvoidtime to identify updates
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary organization and filtering of modification events before presentation to the user. The system pre-segments modifications by location, pre-identifies relevant versus irrelevant changes based on user preferences or document structure, and pre-formats notifications for different viewing contexts. This preliminary processing reduces the user's review time by presenting only pre-filtered, relevant information in an easily scannable format

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements partial action by allowing users to review modifications in stages or selectively. Instead of requiring complete review of all document modifications, the system enables users to focus on modifications in specific locations or of specific types, providing sufficient information for common tasks without forcing review of all possible changes. This partial review approach achieves adequate tracking for most use cases while significantly reducing time investment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Loss of information

If detailed information about all modifications is displayed, then complete understanding of changes is achieved, but ease of operation and user interface simplicity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation about modificationsVSAvoidease of identifying changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments modification information into location-based groups that mirror the document structure. Modifications are organized by their position in the document (e.g., page 1, section 2.1, paragraph 3), creating naturally segmented information groups that are easier to process than a single comprehensive list. Users can navigate to relevant location segments based on their interests or needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to the presentation of modification information. Instead of organizing changes solely by chronology or type in a flat list, the system maps modifications to their physical locations within the document structure, creating a multi-dimensional view where users can navigate both through time (when changes occurred) and space (where changes occurred). This spatial organization significantly improves ease of operation by allowing users to jump directly to relevant areas

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Reliability

If the system tracks modifications across the entire document, then complete monitoring is achieved, but difficulty in detecting and measuring specific portion changes increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetracking accuracyVSAvoiddifficulty of tracking specific portions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the document into discrete location segments (pages, sections, paragraphs, or user-defined regions) and tracks modifications independently within each segment. This segmentation allows the system to maintain reliable tracking accuracy at the document level while simultaneously providing precise detection capability at the portion level. Users can easily identify and measure changes in specific locations without the noise of unrelated modifications elsewhere in the document

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces location metadata as an intermediary layer between the raw modification data and the user interface. This intermediary structure maps each modification event to its specific location within the document hierarchy, enabling precise detection and measurement of portion-level changes. The location metadata acts as a bridge that connects comprehensive document-wide tracking with focused portion-level analysis, resolving the difficulty of detecting specific changes within the broader context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11240320B2System and method for managing notifications of document modifications
Publication Date: 2022.02.01 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11240320B2 patent drawing
  • US11240320B2 patent drawing
  • US11240320B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A document modification event management system for notification of specific edits made to electronic content items, and a method of determining the relevance of the modification. As an example, a first user may make an edit to a portion of a document. A second user may receive a notification of this edit if the system determines the edit was relevant to the second user. In addition, during review of an electronic content item, a reader may select a specific portion of content and view the modifications that have occurred to only the selected portion. These tools can provide collaborative document users the ability to more readily monitor document development and stay up-to-date with changes that are important to them.