Document Priority Scoring for Gene and Drug Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Large content repositories like PubMed face challenges in providing intelligent access to vast amounts of documents, with limited accessibility and no intelligent way to filter or rank relevant information, making it difficult for users to find specific combinations of information such as gene, drug, and cancer-type related data.

Innovation Solution

A system that preprocesses documents to make them machine-readable, classifies them into categories based on specific sections, and assigns a priority score based on the frequency of search terms, allowing users to search and rank documents by relevance using a user interface that differentially weights sections for accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If documents are stored in large content repositories without intelligent filtering, then the quantity of stored information increases, but the accessibility and ease of finding specific information deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of stored documentsVSAvoidease of finding specific information
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments documents into structured sections (title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, discussion, conclusion) and applies different weighting factors to each section. This segmentation allows the system to efficiently search and filter specific portions of documents rather than processing entire documents, resolving the contradiction between storing large quantities of documents and enabling easy access to specific information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary priority scoring system that mediates between the large repository of documents and user search queries. The scoring system processes documents by evaluating search term frequencies in weighted sections, creating an intermediate ranked list that facilitates efficient access without requiring users to search through the entire repository manually.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Loss of information

If full-length research documents are made accessible, then the completeness of information increases, but the complexity of evaluating accuracy and relevance increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompleteness of informationVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluating accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by assigning different weighting factors to different sections of documents based on their relevance to research accuracy. Sections like results, methods, and discussion receive higher weights than title or abstract, allowing the system to focus evaluation on locally important areas rather than treating the entire document uniformly, thus reducing evaluation complexity while maintaining information completeness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If intelligent filtering and priority scoring are implemented, then the accuracy of document retrieval increases, but the processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of document retrievalVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by focusing processing only on specific weighted sections of documents rather than analyzing entire documents. By concentrating computational resources on high-weight sections (results, methods, discussion) and using predefined weighting schemes, the system achieves accurate retrieval without the excessive processing time that would result from analyzing every portion of every document in the repository.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11061913B2Automated document filtration and priority scoring for document searching and access
Publication Date: 2021.07.13 MERATIVE US LP
  • US11061913B2 patent drawing
  • US11061913B2 patent drawing
  • US11061913B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Computer-based methods, systems, and computer readable media for managing documents within a content repository or documents within the document subsets are provided. Documents may be pre-processed to be machine readable and classified within the content repository into one or more categories, based upon a number of times classification terms appear in a specific section of the document or based on an article type tag. Document subsets may be generated based on user-defined terms. Documents may be associated with specific cancer-types, genes, gene variants and drugs by comparing relevant search terms to specific sections of the documents. A request for processing the documents may include one or more of the search terms, pertaining to one or more from a group of gene, gene variant, drug, and cancer terms. A priority score may be determined for documents based on a frequency of one or more of the search terms in each of the specific sections, and the documents may be ranked from highest total priority score to lowest total priority score.