Document Ranking by User Topic Familiarity and Comprehensibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing search engines sort documents based on popularity, neglecting the user's comprehension level, leading to technically detailed documents being prioritized over more comprehensible ones, which can be frustrating and inefficient for users.

Innovation Solution

Assign comprehensibility scores to documents based on sections of text associated with taxonomy topics and user familiarity scores, sorting documents to prioritize those most comprehensible to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If documents are sorted by popularity (number of references), then documents with higher reference counts are presented first, but documents that are more comprehensible to the user are not necessarily prioritized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument importanceVSAvoiduser comprehension
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the sorting parameter from popularity metrics (reference counts) to comprehensibility metrics (user familiarity with taxonomy topics). Instead of using PAGERANK-style algorithms that count links, the system calculates comprehensibility scores based on the user's known familiarity with topics covered in each document, fundamentally changing what parameter drives the sorting order

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates user feedback about topic familiarity into the sorting mechanism. By tracking what topics the user is familiar with and using this information to score document comprehensibility, the system creates a feedback loop where user knowledge state directly influences document presentation order, making the sorting adaptive to individual user needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If technically detailed documents are prioritized, then information depth is improved, but user comprehension becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation depthVSAvoiduser comprehension
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating document presentation based on the specific user's knowledge state. Instead of a uniform sorting approach for all users, the system tailors the comprehensibility score calculation to each user's familiar topics, ensuring that documents are evaluated and ranked according to their local relevance to that user's comprehension level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If documents are sorted by reference count, then popularity is measured accurately, but comprehensibility information is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepopularity measurementVSAvoidcomprehensibility information
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces comprehensibility scores as an intermediary metric between document content and user presentation. Rather than directly using reference counts or raw document properties, the system creates an intermediate comprehensibility score that incorporates both document taxonomy information and user familiarity, serving as a mediator that translates document characteristics into user-relevant ranking information

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12566804B2Comprehensibility scores determined for the documents
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US12566804B2 patent drawing
  • US12566804B2 patent drawing
  • US12566804B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Provided are a computer program product, system, and method for sorting documents according to comprehensibility scores determined for the documents. A document has sections of text associated with topics. A determination is made of familiarity scores for a user for the topics associated with the sections of text in the document. A determination is made of a comprehensibility score of the document, indicating comprehensibility of the document to the user, as a function of the determined familiarity scores for the topics in the document. The comprehensibility score for the document is used to determine an order in which to present the document to the user with a group of documents.