Document Risk Normalization for Early Emotional Response Alerts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to detect and mitigate emotional responses to news items or publications before the audience takes action, missing the opportunity for timely corrective measures.

Innovation Solution

A server computing device analyzes a corpus of documents to determine risk factors, calculates a normalized risk score using cosine similarity and power transformations, and sends real-time alerts when the risk exceeds a threshold, allowing for proactive responses.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a system waits to detect emotional response after audience action, then detection accuracy is improved, but response time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveemotional response detection accuracyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of document content against trained risk factors before dissemination to audience. By pre-calculating risk scores using the formula RiskNormal = 100 * Φ((PowerRisk - mean) / stdDev) and comparing against thresholds, the system identifies potential emotional responses before they occur, enabling proactive mitigation rather than reactive detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where audience reactions to similar documents are fed back into the training corpus. This allows the model to refine its risk predictions over time, improving both detection accuracy and timing by learning from historical patterns of emotional responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If a system analyzes large corpus of documents to improve risk prediction, then prediction accuracy is improved, but computational complexity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most salient features from documents - specifically transforming text to numerical vectors and calculating power risk scores using the formula PowerRisk = RawRisk^0.39. By focusing on these extracted key features rather than analyzing entire document corpora in real-time, the system maintains high prediction accuracy while reducing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw risk values through parameter changes including power transformation (raising to 0.39 power) and normalization using the cumulative distribution function Φ. These parameter transformations convert complex multi-factor risk assessments into standardized normal distributions, simplifying comparison and decision-making while preserving predictive accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of information

If a system uses complex normalization formula to improve risk score interpretability, then interpretability is improved, but calculation time deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk score interpretabilityVSAvoidcalculation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-calculates statistical parameters (mean and standard deviation) from training corpora and stores them for rapid lookup. During real-time analysis, the system only needs to apply the standardized formula RiskNormal = 100 * Φ((PowerRisk - mean) / stdDev) using pre-computed values, rather than performing full normalization calculations from scratch, thus maintaining interpretability while reducing calculation time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the cumulative distribution function Φ as a standardized template that can be efficiently implemented through lookup tables or approximations. By copying this proven statistical transformation approach from standard normal distribution theory, the system achieves rapid calculation of interpretable risk scores without developing complex custom algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS20250390676A1Risk perception normalization system and method
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 TSG TECHNOLOGIES LLC
  • US20250390676A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390676A1 patent drawing
  • US20250390676A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes at least one processor to ingest a corpus of a plurality of documents that comprises training data, parse each document in the corpus of the plurality of documents to determine a word count and a raw risk for each document, determine a normalized risk for each document in the corpus of the plurality of documents using the word count and the raw risk based on an expected mean and an expected standard deviation based on a power risk that equals raw risk0.39 for the corpus of the plurality of documents, receive a new document, parse the new document to determine a word count and a raw risk, and determine a normalized risk for the new document based on the expected mean and the expected standard deviation based on the power risk that equals raw risk0.39 for the corpus of the plurality of documents.