Electronic Document Section Extraction and Review

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems for managing electronic documents are inefficient, requiring multiple computing devices to handle input and transmit entire documents, even when only a portion needs review, leading to resource wastage and unnecessary network usage.

Innovation Solution

A server computing device extracts sections from an electronic document, assigns them to stakeholders for review and approval, and integrates revisions to generate a finalized document, reducing unnecessary resource usage by transmitting only the relevant sections and updates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If the entire electronic document is transmitted to multiple users for review, then all users can access complete document information, but network resources are wasted and transmission time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument information completenessVSAvoidnetwork resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the electronic document into multiple sections and assigns specific sections to specific users for review. Only the relevant sections are transmitted to each user, rather than the entire document. This segmentation approach maintains information completeness for each user's assigned portion while significantly reducing network bandwidth consumption and transmission time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system extracts and transmits only the necessary portions of the document to each user based on their review assignments. This extraction principle ensures that users receive exactly the information they need without unnecessary data, optimizing network resource utilization while preserving document information integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Ease of operation

If multiple computing devices receive and process the entire document multiple times, then each user can provide input on any section, but computing resources are inefficiently utilized

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser input flexibilityVSAvoidcomputing resource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document review process by assigning specific sections to specific users. Each computing device processes only its assigned sections rather than the entire document, improving computing resource efficiency. Users can still provide input on their assigned sections with the same flexibility as processing the full document.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by having users review and provide input on only the sections assigned to them, rather than requiring review of the entire document. This partial review approach maintains operational flexibility for users while significantly improving computing resource efficiency across the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Reliability

If the system transmits the entire document to each user, then users have complete context for review, but transmission time and network usage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereview accuracyVSAvoiddocument transmission time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the document into sections and transmits only the relevant sections to each user for review. This segmentation maintains review accuracy by providing users with complete context for their assigned sections while eliminating transmission of unrelated content, thereby reducing overall transmission time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by providing each user with the complete and accurate information needed for their specific review assignment, rather than uniformly distributing the entire document to all users. This approach ensures review reliability for each user's portion while minimizing total transmission time and network usage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10467334B1Computing system for electronic document management
Publication Date: 2019.11.05 COMPLETE CONTRACT CYCLE LLC
  • US10467334B1 patent drawing
  • US10467334B1 patent drawing
  • US10467334B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An electronic document review system is disclosed herein. A server computing device extracts sections from an electronic document. The server computing device then receives an identity of a stakeholder and an identity of a section from the sections. The stakeholder is authorized to review and approve the section. Responsive to receiving the identity of the stakeholder and the identity of the section, the server computing device transmits the section to a stakeholder computing device operated by the stakeholder. The stakeholder makes a revision to the section by way of the stakeholder computing device, and the stakeholder computing device then transmits the revision to the server computing device. The server computing device then causes an indication of the revision in redline format to be displayed in a graphical user interface of a client application executing on a client computing device operated by a contract manager.