Document State Snapshot Timeline for Accurate Creation Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional techniques for chronicling document creation, such as screen capture and screen capture videos, lack specificity and accuracy in portraying the document creation process, making it difficult for users to efficiently and accurately convey the steps involved in creating a document.

Innovation Solution

A computing device generates document state snapshots at chronological intervals based on predefined criteria, compiling them into a timeline that includes metadata to provide an intuitive and efficient representation of the document creation process, allowing users to view the creation process in a chronological order.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If screen capture technique is used to chronicle document creation, then the entire display or portion can be captured, but the technique lacks specificity and accuracy in portraying the document creation process

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy in portraying document creation processVSAvoidincludes unnecessary UI elements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the relevant document content from the full screen capture, excluding unnecessary user interface elements such as toolbars, menus, and other windows. This is achieved by identifying and capturing only the document editing area, thereby improving accuracy while eliminating extraneous information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the screen capture process into distinct components: capturing the full screen, identifying the document editing area, extracting only the relevant document portion, and excluding UI elements. This segmentation allows for precise capture of document creation states without unnecessary information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If manual selection of display portions is used for screen capture, then specific areas can be captured, but the process is tedious and requires zoom and pan operations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespecificity in capturing document areasVSAvoidtime required for manual selection and zoom operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically identifies and captures the document editing area without requiring manual user selection. The computing device autonomously determines which portions of the display contain the document and captures those areas, eliminating the need for user-initiated zoom and pan operations while maintaining capture precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary identification of the document editing area before the capture process begins. By pre-determining the relevant display regions that contain document content, the system prepares the capture parameters in advance, eliminating the need for subsequent manual adjustments during capture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If conventional screen capture techniques are used, then images can be captured at user request, but the process is not easily automatable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecapture of document statesVSAvoidautomatability of capture process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated detection of document creation events by monitoring changes in the document editing area. When a significant change is detected (such as adding an object, modifying text, or changing layout), the system automatically triggers a capture of the document state, eliminating the need for manual user requests and enabling full automation of the chronicle process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent sets up preliminary automated monitoring of the document editing area before capture begins. The system pre-configures event detection rules and automatically responds to document creation events by capturing states, making the entire process automatable without user intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Duration of action of moving object

If screen capture videos are generated at specified time intervals, then chronological documentation is achieved, but the videos include irrelevant editing operations and cannot determine when frames should be generated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechronological documentation of document creationVSAvoidincludes irrelevant editing operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Duration of action of moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses feedback from monitoring document creation events to determine when to generate frames. By detecting significant changes in the document (such as adding objects, modifying text, or changing layout), the system intelligently triggers frame generation only when relevant changes occur, excluding irrelevant editing operations while maintaining chronological documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic frame generation based on the actual state of document creation rather than fixed time intervals. The system adjusts the timing of frame generation dynamically, creating frames when significant document changes occur and skipping periods of inactivity or minor edits, thereby optimizing the chronological documentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11749312B2Timeline creation of electronic document creation states
Publication Date: 2023.09.05 ADOBE INC
  • US11749312B2 patent drawing
  • US11749312B2 patent drawing
  • US11749312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Timeline creation of electronic document creation states is described. In one or more implementations, document creation states are created responsive to performing editing operations on a document. Document creation state snapshots are then generated for respective document creation states responsive to the document creation states meeting at least one criterion. The at least one criterion may be based on an amount of change in the document, completion of an editing operation, specific alterations to the document, a user request to create a document creation state snapshot, and so on. The resulting document creation state snapshots along with visual representations of metadata associated with the respective document creation states are compiled into a single timeline in a chronological order of when the respective document creation states occurred.