Document Summarization Using Category-Specific ML Templates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated document summarization methods are inefficient and inaccurate due to their inability to consider semantic relationships across entire documents, particularly when dealing with multiple categories, leading to fragmented and incomplete summaries that require significant resources and manual intervention.

Innovation Solution

The system employs machine learning models to categorize documents into predefined categories, generate category-specific annotations, and create summaries using trained models, reducing the need for large reference datasets and minimizing user input, thereby improving semantic accuracy and efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional automated document summarization methods extract specific words, phrases, or sentences from documents, then the summarization process is simplified, but semantic relationships across entire documents are missed resulting in fragmented and incomplete summaries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummarization process simplicityVSAvoidsemantic relationships
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the summarization process into multiple specialized components: a document embedding generator that creates semantic representations, a summary template selector that chooses appropriate templates based on document type, and a summary generator that fills templates with extracted information. This segmentation allows each component to specialize in one aspect while maintaining overall semantic coherence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces document embeddings as an intermediary representation that captures semantic relationships across the entire document. These embeddings serve as a bridge between the raw document text and the summary generation process, enabling the system to understand and preserve semantic relationships rather than merely extracting isolated phrases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If a large volume of reference documents are analyzed to learn information about particular document categories, then the quality of summarization improves, but storage requirements and processing resources increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesummarization qualityVSAvoidreference document volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by pre-defining summary templates for different document categories (e.g., legal documents, medical records, financial reports) that contain the essential structural elements and key information points for each type. This allows the system to learn document category characteristics without analyzing large volumes of reference documents, as the templates already encode the necessary knowledge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter of training data from large volumes of reference documents to a curated set of summary templates with associated metadata. This parameter change reduces storage requirements while maintaining summarization quality, as the templates provide structured guidance for information extraction and synthesis without requiring extensive example documents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If manual document summarization is performed by individuals reviewing documents, then semantic accuracy improves, but time consumption and inconsistency increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesemantic accuracyVSAvoidsummarization time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by designing an automated system that performs summarization without human intervention. The system uses pre-defined templates and machine learning models to automatically extract, synthesize, and generate summaries, eliminating the time consumption and inconsistency associated with manual summarization while maintaining semantic accuracy through structured template guidance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If significant time and financial resources are dedicated to document searches, then document location accuracy improves, but resource efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedocument location accuracyVSAvoidresource efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary action by generating summaries and extracting key information from documents during the ingest phase, before search queries are executed. This pre-processing creates searchable metadata and semantic representations that enable fast, accurate document retrieval without requiring full-document searches, thereby improving resource efficiency while maintaining location accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12159105B2Automated categorization and summarization of documents using machine learning
Publication Date: 2024.12.03 ACCENTURE GLOBAL SOLUTIONS LTD
  • US12159105B2 patent drawing
  • US12159105B2 patent drawing
  • US12159105B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Aspects of the present disclosure provide systems, methods, and computer-readable storage media that support automated summarization of documents using machine learning and artificial intelligence. The summaries include document category-specific summaries for different categories of documents. To illustrate, a document processing device may receive input data representing a document and provide first feature data based on the input data to one or more machine learning (ML) models to select a document category of a plurality of predefined document categories. The document processing device may provide second feature data based on the input data to a second set of ML models associated with the selected document category to generate annotation data associated with the document. The document processing device may provide the annotation data to a third set of ML models to generate a summary of the document, and the document processing device may generate an output based on the summary.