Document Tagging System with Interactive Keyword Suggestions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current document tagging systems are inefficient and often fail to provide the most relevant keywords, leading to difficulties in locating specific documents within large collections of electronic files, as they typically rely on automatic tagging without user confirmation and are not user-friendly.

Innovation Solution

A system and method that examines document contents, context, and user history to intelligently suggest keywords, allowing users to approve and add tags interactively through a user-friendly interface, leveraging machine learning algorithms and user preferences to enhance tagging accuracy and relevance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automatic tagging systems are used to annotate documents with keywords, then tagging speed is improved, but tagging accuracy and relevance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging speedVSAvoidtagging accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system displays suggested tags to users and receives user feedback on whether these tags are relevant. This feedback loop allows the system to learn from user corrections and improve future tag suggestions, resolving the contradiction between automatic tagging speed and tagging accuracy by continuously adapting to user preferences and document characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically generates tag suggestions based on document analysis, allowing the tagging process to serve itself to some extent. The machine learning model autonomously identifies potential tags from document content, metadata, and patterns, reducing the manual effort required while maintaining relevance through user-selectable suggestions rather than completely automatic assignment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive document analysis is performed to identify relevant keywords, then tagging accuracy is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of document contents, metadata, and structure to generate initial tag suggestions before user review. By pre-processing the document and identifying potential tags in advance, the system reduces the time users need to spend on tagging while maintaining accuracy through the quality of pre-generated suggestions based on comprehensive document examination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system analyzes only the most relevant document features and metadata fields necessary for tag generation, rather than performing exhaustive analysis of every document element. This selective analysis approach maintains tagging accuracy by focusing on key indicators while reducing overall processing time by ignoring less relevant document aspects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If users are required to manually select and approve tags, then tagging relevance is improved, but user effort increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetagging relevanceVSAvoiduser effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically generates and presents tag suggestions to users, who simply need to review and select from the provided options rather than creating tags from scratch. This self-service approach maintains tagging relevance through user selection while significantly reducing user effort by eliminating the need for manual tag creation and extensive document analysis by the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system learns from user tag selection patterns and feedback, automatically improving future tag suggestions. Users benefit from progressively more accurate suggestions that require less review effort over time, while maintaining high relevance through continued user feedback on tag quality, creating a virtuous cycle that reduces effort while preserving accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11328004B2Method and system for intelligently suggesting tags for documents
Publication Date: 2022.05.10 MICROSOFT TECHNOLOGY LICENSING LLC
  • US11328004B2 patent drawing
  • US11328004B2 patent drawing
  • US11328004B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and system for providing keyword suggestions to a user of a document during use of the document, the keyword suggestions being made to enable selection of the keywords as tags for the document. The method includes examining contents of a document, identifying a keyword related to the document based at least in part on the contents of the document, displaying the keyword on a user interface element relating to the document to enable a user to choose to add the keyword as a tag associated with the document, receiving an input indicating a user's approval of the keyword, and upon receiving the input, associating the keyword with the document as a tag.