Digital Document Tampering Detection via Multi-Model Fusion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current anti-tampering techniques for digital documents have blind spots that limit their ability to detect sophisticated tampering methods, such as image retouching or image blending, and are often unreliable due to dependencies on specific blurring filters.

Innovation Solution

Combining active and passive tampering detection techniques using multiple models to deploy various anti-tampering methods in conjunction, including passive tamper detection engines that analyze grayscale versions of documents and active tamper detection engines that compare RGB values to historical sets, along with unique digital marker analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a singular anti-tampering technique (e.g., LBP-based or double blurring correlation) is used, then the detection process is simple, but the ability to detect sophisticated tampering (e.g., image retouching or blending) is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detection reliabilityVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple anti-tampering techniques (LBP-based detection, double blurring correlation, and singular value decomposition) into a unified detection system. Each technique processes the document independently and their results are aggregated to produce a final tampering assessment, thereby improving detection reliability while managing system complexity through modular architecture

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The detection system uses a composite approach by integrating multiple detection algorithms with different strengths. LBP handles copy-paste detection, double blurring handles insertion/deletion, and SVD handles sophisticated retouching. This composite methodology ensures comprehensive coverage of various tampering types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

2Reliability

If double blurring correlation methods are used, then certain tampering can be detected, but the reliability depends on specific blurring filter types (e.g., gaussian, median)

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection reliabilityVSAvoidfilter type dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements multiple blurring filter types (Gaussian, median, and other filters) within the double blurring correlation methodology. Each filter type is applied in different detection scenarios, allowing the system to adapt to various document characteristics and tampering methods without being constrained to a single filter type

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adjusts blurring filter parameters (kernel size, sigma values for Gaussian, median window sizes) based on the specific document type and detected tampering patterns. This dynamic parameter adjustment allows the double blurring correlation method to maintain high reliability across different document formats and tampering scenarios

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If LBP-based techniques are used, then copy-paste and insertion tampering can be detected, but sophisticated tampering (e.g., image retouching) is missed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetampering detection precisionVSAvoidtampering type coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system segments the overall tampering detection task into multiple specialized sub-tasks handled by different algorithms. LBP-based detection focuses on copy-paste and insertion patterns, while SVD and double blurring correlation handle sophisticated retouching and blending. This segmentation allows each algorithm to optimize for its specific detection domain while collectively covering all tampering types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20250045380A1Systems and methods for detecting evidence of tampering in a document
Publication Date: 2025.02.06 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US20250045380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045380A1 patent drawing
  • US20250045380A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems, apparatuses, methods, and computer program products are disclosed for detecting evidence of tampering in a digital document. An example method includes receiving by communications hardware, the digital document and determining, by tampering detection circuitry, a tampered region classification result for a region of the digital document. The example method further includes in an instance in which the tampered region classification result indicates tampering, providing, by the tampering detection circuitry, an indication of the region of the digital document and the tampered region classification result to a combination model and receiving, by the tampering detection circuitry, an overall tampering probability from the combination model.