Diffractive Optical Element Beam Combiner Error Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laser systems combining output beams from multiple fiber amplifiers face challenges with beam quality due to piston and tilt errors, leading to power loss and secondary beamlets, which degrade the primary output beam.

Innovation Solution

A high-power laser system incorporating a diffractive optical element (DOE) for beam combination, along with piston and tilt error controllers using phase and amplitude modulation, respectively, to minimize errors and maximize energy in the primary output beam.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a lenslet array is used to combine beams from multiple fiber amplifiers, then beam combination is achieved, but beam quality deteriorates due to the Fourier transform of the lenslet array being imprinted on the far-field pattern

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam combination capabilityVSAvoidbeam quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful Fourier transform pattern imprinting by removing the lenslet array and replacing it with a diffractive optical element (DOE) that combines beams without imprinting its own pattern, thus eliminating the source of beam quality degradation while maintaining combination capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a diffractive optical element (DOE) as an intermediary component that performs beam combination through diffraction rather than refraction, avoiding the fill-factor losses and pattern imprinting associated with lenslet arrays while achieving the desired beam combination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If a lenslet array is used to combine beams, then beam combination is achieved, but power is lost due to overfilling of lenslet aperture and interstitial space

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam combination capabilityVSAvoidinsertion loss
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a diffractive optical element (DOE) as an intermediary that combines beams through diffraction, allowing full utilization of the aperture area without the fill-factor losses inherent in lenslet arrays, thereby reducing energy loss while maintaining combination functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical lenslet array system with a diffractive optical element that uses wave optics (diffraction) instead of geometric optics (refraction), eliminating the interstitial space losses and aperture overfilling issues that cause energy loss in lenslet-based systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If beamlets are incident on DOE at incorrect angles or with incorrect phase, then beam combination is simplified, but secondary beamlets are generated reducing power and beam quality

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam combination simplicityVSAvoidbeam quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by monitoring the output beam for satellite beamlets and adjusting the incident beam angles and phases accordingly, using the presence of secondary beamlets as an error signal to fine-tune the system and eliminate harmful diffraction orders while maintaining simple operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls the parameters of incident beams (angles and phases) to match the DOE design specifications, ensuring that beams are incident at the correct eigenangles with appropriate phase relationships, thereby maximizing energy concentration in the primary beam and minimizing secondary beamlet generation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system effectively reduces secondary beamlets and enhances beam quality by correcting piston and tilt errors, thereby maximizing energy in the primary combined output beam.

Implementation Method 1

a diffractive optical element (DOE) may also be used to combine the beamlets from several fiber amplifiers into one output beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDiffraction: Diffraction

Implementation Method 2

A piston error controller provides for each intermediate beamlet a unique dithering signal used to phase modulate the beamlet before combination

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhase modulation: Phase Modulation

Implementation Method 3

A tilt error controller provides for each non-reference beamlet a tagging signal with which the beamlet is amplitude-modulated prior to combining

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAmplitude modulation: Phase Modulation

Data Source

PatentUS7729398B2Error control for high-power laser system employing diffractive optical element beam combiner
Publication Date: 2010.06.01 NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP
  • US7729398B2 patent drawing
  • US7729398B2 patent drawing
  • US7729398B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high-power laser system includes a laser master oscillator, a plurality of fiber laser amplifiers producing intermediate output beamlets, a diffractive optical element for combining the intermediate beamlets into a combined output beam, and one or more error controllers for minimizing errors related to beam combination that may degrade the quality of the combined output beam. A piston error controller uses phase modulation to tag each non-reference intermediate beamlet with a unique dither signal harmonically unrelated to those used for the other beamlets. For each intermediate beamlet, the associated piston error is recovered using a synchronous detector, and an error control signal proportional to the piston error is supplied to a phase modulator to control the piston error for that beamlet. A tilt error controller uses amplitude modulation based on Hadamard code words to tag each non-reference intermediate beamlet with a unique code sequence orthogonal to those used for the other beamlets. For each intermediate beamlet, the associated tilt error is recovered using a Hadamard decoder, and an error control signal proportional to the tilt error is supplied to a beam steerer to control the tilt error for that beamlet.