Personalized Dog Training System Using Intelligence Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dog training methods fail to effectively utilize canine intelligence and personality assessments to tailor training products and protocols, leading to inefficient and sometimes ineffective training experiences.

Innovation Solution

A system that assesses a dog's intelligence and personality through testing, using databases to match optimal training products and protocols based on individual characteristics, including the development of personalized training protocols and toy selection to align with the dog's specific needs and traits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional generic dog training methods are used, then training can be applied broadly to all dogs, but training effectiveness is reduced due to lack of personalization for individual intelligence and personality types

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining effectivenessVSAvoidtraining system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the dog population into distinct intelligence and personality types through standardized testing protocols. Dogs are categorized into different profiles (e.g., high intelligence vs. low intelligence, independent vs. cooperative) to enable personalized training recommendations rather than generic one-size-fits-all approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of training recommendations based on measured dog characteristics. By varying training methods, product selections, and protocol intensities according to individual dog assessments, the system optimizes training effectiveness for each dog's specific intelligence and personality profile.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If personalized training protocols are developed based on individual dog assessments, then training efficiency and effectiveness improve, but time and cost for assessment and customization increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoidassessment and setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary intelligence and personality assessments before training begins. By conducting these evaluations upfront and establishing personalized training profiles in advance, the system eliminates the need for continuous trial-and-error adjustments during training, ultimately saving time despite the initial assessment investment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates standardized training protocol templates for different dog types that can be replicated and adapted. Once assessment protocols and training recommendations are established, they can be efficiently copied and applied to similar dogs, reducing the time and cost burden of personalization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Quantity of substance

If inappropriate training products and methods are used, then cost savings are achieved by avoiding personalized assessments, but training outcomes deteriorate and require longer training periods

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining costVSAvoidtraining duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback loops where training progress is monitored and compared against expected outcomes based on the dog's intelligence and personality profile. This feedback mechanism allows for early detection of ineffective training approaches, enabling timely adjustments that prevent wasted time and resources on inappropriate methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10521523B2Computer simulation of animal training scenarios and environments
Publication Date: 2019.12.31 RADIO SYST CORP
  • US10521523B2 patent drawing
  • US10521523B2 patent drawing
  • US10521523B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is described herein that comprises selecting a training objective, wherein the training objective comprises an objective to teach an animal to perform a behavior in an environment. The method includes testing the animal to determine a profile. The method includes identifying an optimal training product for the animal based on the profile. The method includes identifying an optimal training protocol for the animal based on the profile. The method includes simulating an experience of teaching the animal the behavior in a virtual training environment using the optimal training product and the optimal training protocol, the simulating including one or more applications running on a computing device for providing a virtual training environment, wherein the virtual training environment mimics the environment.