Doherty Power Amplifier Biasing for Peak Power and Backoff Efficiency
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Traditional bipolar junction transistor (BJT)-based Doherty power amplifiers face challenges in maximizing peak output power while maintaining power backoff efficiency due to limitations in peaking amplifier gain and output power, requiring trade-offs between peak output power and power backoff efficiency, and existing solutions fail to adequately address these issues without degrading RF performance.
Innovation Solution
The implementation of a power adaptive biasing circuitry that senses direct current base voltages of the carrier amplifier and generates control currents to debias the peaking amplifier, allowing it to operate in deep class C at low to mid dynamic power regions and shallow class C or class AB at peak power regions, thereby optimizing both peak output power and power backoff efficiency.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Loss of energy
If the peaking amplifier is biased in class C to improve power backoff efficiency, then power backoff efficiency is improved, but peak output power is reduced due to insufficient pPA gain and output power
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies dynamic biasing by transitioning the peaking amplifier from a fixed class C bias to a dynamic bias scheme where the bias voltage is adjusted in real-time based on the signal envelope. The bias voltage transitions from a lower class C bias during low-power operation to a higher class AB/BC bias during peak power operation, enabling the system to optimize power backoff efficiency at low power while achieving sufficient peak output power when needed.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent changes the bias voltage parameter dynamically based on operating conditions. By modifying the bias voltage from a fixed value to a time-varying parameter that adapts to the signal envelope, the system achieves both high power backoff efficiency (when bias is low in class C) and high peak output power (when bias is raised to class AB/BC during peaks).
2Power
If the bias is raised to move the peaking amplifier into class B or class AB to improve peak output power, then peak output power is improved, but power backoff efficiency is reduced
Solution Approach 1:
Instead of using a static high bias (class AB) that degrades power backoff efficiency, the patent employs dynamic biasing where the peaking amplifier operates in class C during low-power conditions (maintaining high power backoff efficiency) and transitions to class AB/BC only during peak power conditions (providing sufficient peak output power). This dynamic adaptation eliminates the need for continuous high bias.
Solution Approach 2:
The bias voltage is modulated periodically or continuously according to the signal envelope characteristics. During most of the time (low-power regions), the bias remains at the efficient class C level, and during peak periods, it transitions to class AB/BC to provide adequate peak output power, thus achieving both goals through periodic/burst-mode operation.
3Ease of operation
If traditional power detector approaches are used to control bias, then bias control is achieved, but the system requires long RC time constants that are not appropriate for modern signals with 100 MHz or higher RF bandwidth
Solution Approach 1:
The patent replaces the traditional RC-based power detector mechanism with an alternative detection approach that does not rely on long time constants. By substituting the RC time-constant-based detection with a different detection mechanism that can operate at higher speeds, the system achieves both ease of bias control and fast envelope tracking capability suitable for 100 MHz and higher bandwidth signals.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2A~2D
Figure 2E~2H
AI summary
Disclosed is an amplifier having a carrier amplifier (Q3, Q4) configured as a common-emitter carrier power stage and a peaking amplifier (Q5, Q6) configured as a common-emitter peaking power stage. Further included is power adaptive biasing circuitry (18) coupled between the carrier amplifier (Q3, Q4) and the peaking amplifier (Q5, Q6), wherein the power adaptive biasing circuitry (18) is configured to sense direct current base voltages of the common-emitter carrier power stage and to generate control currents that debias the common-emitter carrier power stage in response to the direct current base voltages of the common-emitter carrier power stage.