Domain Adaptation Framework for Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing anomaly detection methods using deep learning face uncertainty in out-of-distribution scenarios, such as shifts in machine load or environmental noise, when applied to industrial equipment monitoring via audio data.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method for domain adaptation that trains a machine learning system using a domain adapting framework, which generates prototypes and optimizes loss outputs for multiple tasks in a source domain, then fine-tunes the system with few-shot examples from a target domain to adapt to new conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing deep learning methods are used for anomaly detection, then the system can identify anomalies in standard conditions, but the system performance degrades under out-of-distribution scenarios such as shifts in machine load or environmental noise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanomaly detection reliabilityVSAvoidadaptability to domain shifts
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary domain adaptation training by generating synthetic prototypes and optimizing loss functions across multiple tasks before actual anomaly detection. This pre-adaptation prepares the model to handle out-of-distribution scenarios by exposing it to varied domain characteristics during training, thereby improving reliability when encountering shifts in machine load or environmental noise during deployment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by generating domain-specific prototypes and adjusting loss function weights during domain adaptation. By modifying the training parameters to include domain adaptation loss and prototype-based supervision, the model learns to maintain anomaly detection reliability across different operational conditions and domain shifts

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Adaptability or versatility

If the machine learning system is trained with extensive data from multiple domains, then the system can generalize better to new conditions, but the training time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeneralization to new conditionsVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential domain characteristics by generating synthetic prototypes that represent key domain features, rather than requiring extensive actual domain data. This extraction approach enables the model to learn domain adaptation with minimal training data, reducing training time while maintaining generalization capability to new conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates synthetic copies of domain characteristics through prototype generation, which mimics the essential features of target domains without requiring access to actual domain data. This copying mechanism allows rapid domain adaptation with minimal training time while preserving the ability to generalize to diverse operational conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If the system is fine-tuned with limited data from the target domain, then the system can adapt quickly to new conditions, but the detection accuracy may be insufficient compared to full training

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation speedVSAvoidanomaly detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary training on source domain data and generates domain-agnostic prototypes before fine-tuning on target domain data. This preliminary preparation ensures that even with limited target domain data, the model retains strong anomaly detection capabilities while adapting quickly to new conditions, balancing adaptation speed and detection accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Adaptability or versatility

If multiple tasks are trained in the source domain, then the system learns more robust features for domain adaptation, but the training complexity and computational cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain adaptation capabilityVSAvoidtraining framework complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal domain adaptation framework that handles multiple source domain tasks through a unified prototype generation and loss optimization approach. This multi-functional framework enables the model to learn from diverse tasks while maintaining a consistent adaptation mechanism, improving domain adaptation capability without proportionally increasing training framework complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230259810A1Domain Adapting Framework for Anomalous Detection
Publication Date: 2023.08.17 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US20230259810A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259810A1 patent drawing
  • US20230259810A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computer-implemented system and method includes obtaining a plurality of tasks from a first domain. A machine learning system is trained to perform a first task. A first set of prototypes is generated. The first set of prototypes is associated with a first set of classes of the first task. The machine learning system is updated based on a first loss output. The first loss output includes a first task loss, which takes into account the first set of prototypes. The machine learning system is trained to perform a second task. A second set of prototypes is generated. The second set of prototypes is associated with a second set of classes of the second task. The machine learning system is updated based on a second loss output. The second loss output includes a second task loss, which takes into account the second set of prototypes. The machine learning system is updated based on the second loss output. The machine learning system is fine-tuned with a new task from a second domain.