Domain Identifier Access Policy Control for Network Routing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for controlling accessibility between multiple data centers are burdensome, requiring extensive configuration and numerous host entries, as they often accept all routes for specified Level 3 ISIDs from all domains, leading to inefficient resource utilization and lack of granular control.

Innovation Solution

Assigning unique domain IDs to network devices and using domain ID-based accept policies to selectively accept or deny routes, allowing for more precise control over which data centers share routes, thereby reducing hardware and configuration requirements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If ADV-RTR and ISID based accept policies are used to control route acceptance from multiple data centers, then route accessibility control is achieved, but configuration complexity and number of host entries increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute acceptance controlVSAvoidconfiguration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the control mechanism by introducing domain IDs that group data centers into domains. Instead of controlling each data center individually through numerous host entries, routes are controlled at the domain level. Each domain is assigned a unique domain ID, and accept policies reference domain IDs rather than individual host entries, significantly reducing configuration complexity while maintaining granular control over route acceptance from different data centers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Adaptability or versatility

If all routes for specified Level 3 ISIDs are accepted from all domains, then route diversity is maximized, but hardware resource utilization increases and granular control is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroute diversityVSAvoidhardware resource utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements partial action by allowing selective acceptance of routes based on domain ID matching accept policies. Instead of accepting all routes from all domains (excessive action), the system accepts only those routes from domains that match the configured accept policies. This partial acceptance approach maintains necessary route diversity while avoiding the hardware resource consumption associated with processing and storing all possible routes from every domain.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If numerous host entries are programmed into data paths to control accessibility, then access control precision is improved, but configuration time and operational burden increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess control precisionVSAvoidconfiguration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces domain IDs as an intermediary layer between the control policy and individual host entries. Instead of directly programming numerous specific host entries into data paths (which is time-consuming and operationally burdensome), the system uses domain IDs as mediators. The accept policies reference domain IDs, and the system automatically applies the appropriate control actions to all routes from matching domains. This intermediary approach maintains precise access control while dramatically reducing configuration time and operational burden.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10554618B2Domain identifier based access policy control
Publication Date: 2020.02.04 AVAYA INC
  • US10554618B2 patent drawing
  • US10554618B2 patent drawing
  • US10554618B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems and computer readable media for domain identifier (ID) based access policy control are described.