Domain Name Valuation via Weighted Linguistic and Historical Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining the value of a domain name lack efficiency and accuracy, particularly in assessing its intrinsic value before and after registration, and do not effectively account for various factors such as linguistic analysis, technical sophistication, and registrant engagement.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a domain name analyzer to compute an initial lifetime worth and lifetime worth of a domain name by applying inputs from various data sources, including DNS servers, registrars, and databases, using a weighted linear combination of attributes like historical comparable domains, linguistic frequency, and technical sophistication, and providing real-time valuation and registration offers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional domain name valuation methods are used, then the valuation process is simple, but the accuracy and reliability of the valuation result is poor

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The valuation system is segmented into multiple independent modules: data collection module, data processing module, valuation calculation module, and reporting module. Each module handles specific tasks (collecting domain attributes, processing linguistic/technical data, calculating valuation using weighted algorithms, generating reports), allowing the complex valuation process to be managed through discrete, manageable components that improve accuracy without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces intermediary components including a domain name analyzer that acts as a mediator between raw domain data and valuation results, and a data processing layer that intermediates between multiple data sources (DNS servers, registrars, databases) and the valuation engine. These intermediaries standardize and refine data before valuation calculation, improving measurement precision while maintaining manageable system complexity through clear architectural boundaries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data sources and factors are considered in valuation, then the valuation accuracy improves, but the data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-collecting and storing domain attributes, historical data, and comparable domain information in databases before valuation is needed. Data from DNS servers, registrars, and other sources is pre-processed and organized into structured formats. This preliminary preparation reduces processing time during actual valuation operations while maintaining comprehensive data analysis for accurate results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies parameter changes by using weighted linear combination algorithms that dynamically adjust the importance (weights) of different valuation factors based on domain characteristics. The system transforms qualitative attributes (linguistic quality, technical sophistication) into quantifiable parameters with assigned weights, enabling efficient computational processing of multiple data sources while maintaining valuation accuracy through mathematically rigorous parameter transformation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If comprehensive domain attributes are analyzed, then the valuation reliability improves, but the complexity of data collection and processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevaluation reliabilityVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Comprehensive domain attributes are segmented into distinct categories: linguistic attributes (frequency, quality scores), technical attributes (hosting infrastructure sophistication, web page structure), registrant attributes (engagement metrics, renewal history), and market attributes (comparable domains, traffic data). Each category is processed by specialized sub-modules, improving valuation reliability through comprehensive analysis while managing complexity through functional segmentation of the data processing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements universal data processing components that handle multiple attribute types through standardized interfaces. The domain name analyzer serves multiple functions: collecting data from various sources, processing different attribute categories, and generating valuation results. This multi-functionality approach maintains high valuation reliability through comprehensive attribute analysis while reducing overall system complexity by avoiding redundant processing logic for each attribute type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20240095767A1System and method for domain name valuation
Publication Date: 2024.03.21 VERISIGN INC
  • US20240095767A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095767A1 patent drawing
  • US20240095767A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a computer system for performing the method of determining an initial value or lifetime value for a domain name is provided. The method for determining an initial value includes obtaining, over a communication network, a domain name from requestor; obtaining, over the communication network, one or more inputs from one or more domain name data sources; applying the one or more inputs and the domain name to an initial lifetime worth computer model, wherein the one or more inputs comprise data related to comparable historical domain names, data from a linguistic model analysis, data from a linguistic frequency list, and data related to a second-level domain to top-level domain relationship analysis; determining, by a hardware processor, an initial lifetime worth for the domain name based on the initial lifetime worth computer model; and providing the initial lifetime worth for the domain name to the requestor.