Domain Name Scoring System Using Predictive Value Assessment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Evaluating the value of a domain name before registration is challenging due to the inefficiency and high costs associated with registering and maintaining a website to assess its usefulness, as existing methods require significant resources and time to gauge traffic and user engagement.

Innovation Solution

A domain name evaluation system that uses a computerized service to score domain names by combining user-provided information with automated data from public and internal sources, providing a scorecard with suggestions for improvement, and offering options to enhance the domain's value, such as registering additional TLDs, private registration, and security services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If domain names are registered and websites are maintained to evaluate their usefulness, then accurate assessment of domain value is achieved, but significant costs and time resources are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain value assessment accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by evaluating domain names before registration using multiple predictive criteria including keyword analysis, domain extension evaluation, traffic potential estimation, and branding value assessment. This allows users to determine domain value in advance without needing to register and maintain the domain first, thereby saving time and resources while maintaining assessment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual model or copy of the domain evaluation process by using historical data, traffic patterns, and market analysis to simulate how a domain would perform. This copying approach allows accurate assessment of domain potential without actually deploying the domain, thus avoiding the time and costs of real-world testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Loss of information

If domain names are registered and websites are maintained to assess traffic and user engagement, then useful domain value information is obtained, but significant costs are incurred

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain value informationVSAvoidevaluation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary evaluation system that uses multiple criteria (keyword relevance, domain extension value, traffic potential, branding value, SEO potential) to assess domain names. This intermediary system provides comprehensive domain value information without requiring actual domain registration or website maintenance, thereby obtaining necessary information while avoiding significant costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a multi-functional evaluation framework that simultaneously assesses multiple aspects of domain value (traffic potential, branding, SEO, keyword relevance) in a single process. This universal approach provides comprehensive domain information without requiring separate testing for each metric, reducing overall evaluation costs while maintaining information quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional domain evaluation methods are used, then domain value can be assessed, but the process is inefficient and resource-intensive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedomain evaluation reliabilityVSAvoidevaluation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the domain evaluation process into distinct components: keyword analysis, domain extension evaluation, traffic potential assessment, branding value analysis, and SEO potential evaluation. Each segment can be independently calculated and combined to produce the overall domain score, improving efficiency while maintaining reliability through comprehensive coverage of all value factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transforms the evaluation approach by changing parameters from actual domain performance metrics (which require registration) to predictive parameters based on domain characteristics, market data, and historical patterns. This parameter transformation enables reliable evaluation to occur before registration, dramatically improving efficiency without sacrificing assessment reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS8799295B2Method and system for scoring domain names
Publication Date: 2014.08.05 NETWORK SOLUTIONS INC
  • US8799295B2 patent drawing
  • US8799295B2 patent drawing
  • US8799295B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for scoring domain names are provided. A domain name may be scored based on a set of criteria, and a sub-score assigned to each criteria. The sub-scores may be used to generate a domain name score and identify ways of increasing the score of the domain name. A domain name score may provide an indication of the value or usefulness of the domain name.