Domain-Specific Human-Model Annotation Training with Attention Maps

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The shortage of domain-specific human annotators with professional training and knowledge poses a challenge in efficiently labeling diverse biomedical data, limiting the effectiveness of medical image data annotation for deep learning models.

Innovation Solution

A human-model collaborative annotation system that trains non-expert annotators using expert knowledge transfer through personalized training, attention maps, and evaluation, integrating human and machine learning to improve annotation efficiency and quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If generic labelling tools are used with inexperienced annotators, then annotation productivity increases, but annotation quality deteriorates due to lack of domain knowledge

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation productivityVSAvoidannotation quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an automated evaluation module as an intermediary that objectively assesses annotation quality by comparing annotations against reference standards. This mediator provides real-time feedback to annotators, enabling inexperienced workers to maintain high quality while increasing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where annotator performance is automatically evaluated and fed back to the annotator. This includes quality scores, error identification, and guidance for improvement, allowing annotators to learn and maintain high standards without requiring extensive domain expertise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If expert annotators are used to ensure high annotation quality, then annotation precision improves, but annotation productivity decreases due to shortage of domain experts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation qualityVSAvoidannotation productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service through automated evaluation and feedback mechanisms that guide annotators independently. Inexperienced annotators can achieve expert-level quality through the system's built-in guidance, reference materials, and real-time feedback without requiring actual expert annotators for every task.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and utilizes reference annotations from expert annotators as templates and ground truth. These reference annotations are copied and used as standards for evaluating and training new annotators, allowing the system to maintain expert-level quality standards while scaling to large volumes of annotation work.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If personalized training with attention maps is provided to annotators, then annotation quality improves, but training time and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveannotation qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces manual expert review and personalized mentoring with an automated computer-based evaluation system. The automated module generates attention maps and performance feedback algorithmically, substituting the mechanical process of human expert training with an automated digital system that scales without proportional increases in complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12374133B2Domain-specific human-model collaborative annotation tool
Publication Date: 2025.07.29 HUAWEI CLOUD COMPUTING TECHNOLOGIES CO LTD
  • US12374133B2 patent drawing
  • US12374133B2 patent drawing
  • US12374133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A human-model collaborative annotation system for training human annotators includes a database that stores images previously annotated by an expert human annotator and/or a machine learning annotator, a display that displays images selected from the database, an annotation system that enables human annotators to annotate images presented on the display, and an annotation training system. The annotation training system selects an image sample from the database for annotation by a human annotator, receives one or more proposed annotations from the annotation system, compares the human annotator's one or more proposed annotations to previous annotations of the image sample by the expert human annotator or machine learning annotator, presents attention maps on the display to draw the human annotator's attention to any annotation errors identified by the comparing, and selects a next training image sample from the database based on any errors identified in the comparing step.