Dome-Array Photovoltaic Structure With Metal-Less Back Reflector

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing solar cell architectures rely on expensive metals like silver for reflector/electrode structures, which are costly and time-consuming to process, and often require texturing that complicates manufacturing, while also suffering from plasmonic losses and performance degradation due to sharp features.

Innovation Solution

A photovoltaic device with a periodic array of dome-like protrusions at the front surface and a metal-less reflector/electrode back contact structure using transparent conductive materials, which refracts light to enhance momentum parallel to the back contact and eliminates the need for metal layers and texturing, fabricated without hard mask deposition and etching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metal layers (silver) are used for reflector/electrode structures, then optical reflectivity and electrical conductivity are improved, but manufacturing cost and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical reflectivityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the metal layer from the back reflector/electrode structure, extracting the expensive and complex component while retaining the essential optical function through a transparent conductive material (TCO) layer combined with a dielectric layer. This extraction eliminates the need for vacuum deposition processes and reduces material costs while maintaining reflectivity through alternative optical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive metal layers with cheaper transparent conductive materials such as ITO (indium tin oxide), IZO (indium zinc oxide), or GZO (gallium zinc oxide). These TCO materials are less expensive than silver and can be deposited using simpler, less time-consuming processes while providing sufficient electrical conductivity and optical transparency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Reliability

If metal layers are used for reflector/electrode structures, then electrical conductivity is improved, but processing time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveelectrical conductivityVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the metal layer from the back reflector/electrode structure, extracting the expensive and complex component while retaining the essential optical function through a transparent conductive material (TCO) layer combined with a dielectric layer. This extraction eliminates the need for vacuum deposition processes and reduces material costs while maintaining reflectivity through alternative optical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the metal-based electrical conduction system with a transparent conductive material system that achieves electrical conductivity through different physical mechanisms (carrier concentration control in semiconducting materials) rather than through metallic conduction, enabling simpler deposition processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Use of energy by moving object

If texturing is used for light management, then light absorption is improved, but manufacturing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelight absorptionVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of creating complex surface textures to enhance light absorption, the patent inverts the approach by using a flat surface with a transparent conductive material layer that utilizes optical interference and reflection from the dielectric layer to achieve light management. This inversion simplifies manufacturing while maintaining optical performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the optical parameters by introducing a dielectric layer with specific refractive index and thickness to control light reflection and absorption. By adjusting the dielectric layer parameters (thickness, material composition) rather than surface geometry, the system achieves light management with simpler manufacturing processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If metal layers are used for reflector structures, then optical performance is improved, but plasmonic losses occur

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptical performanceVSAvoidplasmonic losses
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the metal layer from the back reflector/electrode structure, extracting the expensive and complex component while retaining the essential optical function through a transparent conductive material (TCO) layer combined with a dielectric layer. This extraction eliminates the need for vacuum deposition processes and reduces material costs while maintaining reflectivity through alternative optical design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful plasmonic losses associated with metal layers into beneficial optical interference effects by using a transparent conductive material with a dielectric layer. The TCO layer, combined with the dielectric layer, creates constructive interference for light reflection while avoiding the energy-dissipating plasmonic resonances that occur in metal structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This design improves light utilization and reduces manufacturing costs by avoiding expensive metals and simplifying processing, while maintaining or exceeding the performance of traditional structures with metal-based reflectors, and enhances short circuit current density and device efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

The beneficial interaction between an appropriately designed top protrusion array and these reflector/electrode back contacts (R/EBCs) serves (1) to refract the incoming light in a manner to thereby provide photons with an advantageous larger momentum component parallel to the plane of the back (R/EBC) contact

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Implementation Method 2

Each reflector/back electrode form operates as a back light reflector and counter electrode to the periodic array of dome or dome-like structures

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReflection: Reflection

Data Source

PatentUS12514028B2Nano-scale light intensity concentration control
Publication Date: 2025.12.30 FONASH STEPHEN J
  • US12514028B2 patent drawing
  • US12514028B2 patent drawing
  • US12514028B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A photovoltaic or light detecting device is provided that includes a periodic array of dome or dome-like protrusions at the light impingement surface and three forms of reflector/back electrode at the device back. The beneficial interaction between an appropriately designed top protrusion array and these reflector/electrode back contacts (R/EBCs) serve (1) to refract the incoming light thereby providing photons with an advantageous larger momentum component parallel to the plane of the back (R/EBC) contact and (2) to provide optical impedance matching for the short wavelength incoming light. The reflector/back electrode operates as a back light reflector and counter electrode to the periodic array of dome or dome-like structures. A substrate supports the reflector/back electrode.