Dome-Shaped Plantpot Base With Profile Struts

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional plant pots for commercial horticulture, designed to be thin-walled for cost savings, often sag and buckle due to filling or root pressure, compromising drainage and stability, especially when filled with substrate or inserting trellises, leading to instability and potential waterlogging issues.

Innovation Solution

The integration of profile struts, either as solid or hollow profiles, to stiffen the dome-shaped base, converting bending forces into tensile forces that are absorbed by the pot's peripheral walls, enhancing stability and preventing buckling while maintaining water drainage capabilities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of substance

If the plant pot bottom is made thin-walled for cost savings, then material expenditure is reduced, but the base becomes susceptible to buckling and pushing through under load

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial expenditureVSAvoidbase stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of substanceVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base is divided into a dome-shaped area and a flat peripheral area separated by profile struts. This segmentation allows the dome area to be thin-walled for material savings while the profile struts provide structural reinforcement to prevent buckling under load.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base has different structural qualities in different areas: the dome-shaped area uses thin-walled construction for material efficiency, while the profile struts and flat peripheral area provide localized reinforcement where structural strength is needed to prevent buckling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Volume of stationary object

If the dome shape is kept relatively flat to minimize pot space loss, then volume is reduced, but the base becomes vulnerable to buckling when vigorously filled

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepot spaceVSAvoidresistance to buckling
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of stationary objectVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base is segmented into a dome-shaped area and a flat peripheral area with profile struts between them. This allows the majority of the base to remain flat for volume efficiency while the profile struts provide localized reinforcement to prevent buckling during vigorous filling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The base structure varies by location: the dome-shaped area provides minimal arching for volume efficiency, while the profile struts and flat peripheral area provide localized structural reinforcement where buckling resistance is critical during filling operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Strength

If profile struts are added to stiffen the dome shape, then buckling resistance is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebuckling resistanceVSAvoidbase structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The profile struts are merged with the dome-shaped base in a single molded construction. This integration combines the reinforcement function with the base structure itself, avoiding the need for separate attachment components and reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The profile struts serve multiple functions: they reinforce the dome shape to prevent buckling, separate the dome-shaped and flat peripheral areas, and are integrated into the single-mold construction. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If the bottom provides openings for drainage, then water drainage capability is improved, but the base becomes more vulnerable to structural failure under pressure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewater drainageVSAvoidstructural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The base has different structural qualities in different areas: the dome-shaped area with profile struts provides structural reinforcement to prevent buckling, while the flat peripheral area contains drainage openings. This local differentiation allows drainage functionality without compromising overall structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution effectively secures the dome-shaped base against buckling and pushing through, ensuring stability and efficient water drainage, even under heavy loads, while being compatible with conventional manufacturing methods and minimizing material expenditure.

Implementation Method 1

converting bending forces into tensile forces that are absorbed by the pot's peripheral walls

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce transformation: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP2197262B1Plastic plantpot
Publication Date: 2018.05.16 POPPELMANN HOLDING GMBH & CO KG
  • EP2197262B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2197262B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2197262B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A plastic plantpot (1), comprising a predominantly vertically oriented wall (2) and a predominantly horizontally oriented base (5) which is connected at its edge to the wall (2) and which is upwardly curved in the form of a dome (13, 21) at least in an inner portion, is designed, with the aim of securing the base region against pushing-through and denting of the thinnest possible thin-walled material, in such a way that the dome (13, 21) is reinforced by profiled braces (14, 22) which extend as underprops from a central region (15) of the dome (13, 21) to at least peripheral regions (9) of the dome (13, 21).