Dome-Top Tripod Hub Layout for Ergonomic Leveling Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing tripod designs, such as Center-Tube, Flat-Top, and Bowl-Top tripods, face issues with large pack diameter, weight, and inconvenient user access to control handles, which limit their stability, compactness, and ergonomic usability, especially in outdoor applications.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of a 'Dome-Top' tripod design, which features a tension control handle positioned above the hub, allowing for two-handed ergonomic control and eliminating the need for additional access clearance, resulting in a smaller pack diameter, reduced weight, and improved stability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If a Bowl-Top tripod design is used to provide easy leveling functionality, then stability and load capacity are improved, but the control handle position becomes awkward and access is inconvenient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetripod stabilityVSAvoidcontrol handle access
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional Bowl-Top design by moving the control mechanism from below the hub to above the hub. This inversion allows the control handle to be positioned in an easily accessible location while maintaining the stable bowl-top structural foundation, resolving the contradiction between stability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent repositions the control handle from a vertical position below the hub to a horizontal position above the hub, changing the spatial dimension of control access. This dimensional change allows operators to access controls without bending or reaching between legs, improving ergonomics while preserving structural stability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Ease of operation

If a Bowl-Top tripod design is used with wide leg spacing for hand clearance, then control access is enabled, but the pack diameter becomes large

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehand clearance for controlVSAvoidpack diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By inverting the control mechanism position from below to above the hub, the patent eliminates the need for wide leg spacing to accommodate hand clearance. This allows the legs to be positioned closer together, reducing the overall pack diameter while maintaining full control accessibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Adaptability or versatility

If a Center-Tube tripod design is used to provide adjustable central column, then vertical adjustment is enabled, but the central column interferes with leg collapse and increases pack diameter

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentral column adjustmentVSAvoidpack diameter
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the control functionality from the central column assembly and relocates it to the hub area above. This separation allows the central column to be positioned optimally for structural reasons without requiring additional clearance space, enabling full leg collapse while maintaining column adjustability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Volume of moving object

If a Flat-Top tripod design is used to reduce weight and pack diameter, then compactness is improved, but separate camera head is required adding weight and size

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepack diameterVSAvoidoverall system weight
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the leveling base functionality and the tripod head controls into a single integrated hub assembly. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate camera heads while maintaining compact dimensions, as the integrated design shares common structural components and control mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12326216B2Dome-top tripod system
Publication Date: 2025.06.10 WARNER VINCENT S
  • US12326216B2 patent drawing
  • US12326216B2 patent drawing
  • US12326216B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Two embodiments of a Dome-Top tripod system adjust reactive force between a domed base and a concave top in two separate methods. Both embodiments feature two interfacing discs, one with a convex interface surface and the other with a mating convex interface surface, which friction lock to hold a payload in place. One features a translatable nut and shaft which then loosens or tightens the friction lock. The other version features a translatable drive nut which interacts with the top disk and loosens and releases the friction lock.