Dominant Color Determination Using Spatial Weighting and Chroma Filtering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems for determining dominant colors in digital images rely on mathematical algorithms that average color values, often resulting in low chroma colors and emphasizing background colors, which differ from human perception.

Innovation Solution

A system that divides a digital image into pixel groups with varying sample rates, weighting pixels closer to the center more heavily, and excluding pixels with low chroma or lightness values, to determine a dominant color that better mimics human perception, and outputs a matching paint color.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If mathematical algorithms average color values across all pixels, then processing is simple and fast, but the result emphasizes background colors and produces low chroma colors that differ from human perception

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of dominant color determinationVSAvoidcomplexity of image processing algorithm
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The image is divided into multiple regions (e.g., foreground region and background region) based on spatial position. Different sampling strategies are applied to different regions: higher sampling density for foreground pixels and lower sampling density for background pixels. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by enabling perceptually accurate color determination while maintaining processing efficiency through region-specific optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different quality levels of analysis are applied to different parts of the image. Foreground pixels, which are more important for human perception, receive more intensive analysis with higher sampling rates. Background pixels receive less intensive analysis with lower sampling rates. This local differentiation improves measurement precision for the most important regions while reducing overall computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If all pixels are analyzed at high sample rate, then dominant color accuracy improves, but processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of dominant color determinationVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of analyzing all pixels at maximum detail, the system applies partial analysis: high-sample-rate analysis is applied only to foreground pixels that contribute most to perceived dominant color, while background pixels are analyzed at lower sample rates. This partial action approach maintains accuracy for the most important regions while significantly reducing total processing time and computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Area of stationary object

If background pixels are included in analysis, then complete image coverage is achieved, but the dominant color result is skewed toward background colors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage coverage areaVSAvoidaccuracy of dominant color perception
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The image is segmented into foreground and background regions with different weighting schemes. Foreground pixels are assigned higher weights in the color averaging process, while background pixels are assigned lower weights. This segmentation enables the system to maintain complete image coverage while preventing background colors from skewing the dominant color determination, thereby improving measurement precision to match human perception.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter of pixel weighting based on spatial position. Pixels closer to the center of the image (typically foreground) are given higher weight values, while pixels farther from the center (typically background) are given lower weight values. This parameter change resolves the contradiction by maintaining full image coverage while ensuring that the dominant color reflects foreground prominence as perceived by humans.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240346695A1Systems And Methods For Determining Dominant Colors In An Image
Publication Date: 2024.10.17 BEHR PROCESS CORP
  • US20240346695A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346695A1 patent drawing
  • US20240346695A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for determining a dominant color in a digital image are provided and include selecting pixels a digital image and applying a chroma filter, a low lightness filter, and/or a high lightness filter to the selected pixels. The remaining pixels after filtering are grouped based on hue, chroma, and lightness. A dominant color for the digital image is determined based on a color associated with the group that has the greatest number of pixels.