Vehicle Door Actuator Mechanism for Low-Force Opening

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing door actuating apparatuses for vehicles require significant operational force to open doors from a full close position, are bulky due to complex drive circuits and multiple components, and are costly to manufacture and maintain.

Innovation Solution

A door actuating apparatus with an engagement mechanism that automatically releases the door from a full close position to a predetermined rotational position using an actuator, allowing for easy manual opening and reducing the need for multiple actuators, with a simplified drive circuit and control unit.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If an electric motor and electromagnetic clutch are used to automatically open and close the door, then the door can be opened without difficulty, but the drive circuit becomes large in size and cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of door openingVSAvoiddrive circuit size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and eliminates the electric motor and electromagnetic clutch from the door actuating system. Instead, it uses a simple manual door handle mechanism that directly operates the latch, removing the need for complex drive circuits while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The door handling system is designed to be self-operating through manual effort. The door handle and latch mechanism work together without requiring external power sources or control systems, allowing the door to be opened and closed simply by user action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Extent of automation

If an electric motor and electromagnetic clutch are used to control the door, then automated door opening is achieved, but computer hardware and software configurations become complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated door openingVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the automated control system including electric motors, electromagnetic clutches, and associated computer hardware and software. The door operation is returned to pure manual control through a simplified mechanical latch and handle system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The door system operates autonomously through manual user input without requiring any automated control systems. The mechanical latch and handle work together to provide intuitive door operation without sensors, processors, or control algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If a simple manual door handle is used, then the apparatus is small in size and low in cost, but a particularly large operational force is required to open the door from full close position

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapparatus sizeVSAvoidoperational force
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The door opening process is segmented into two distinct phases: an initial phase where a relatively small force overcomes the latch retention at full close position, and a subsequent phase where the door opens freely. The latch mechanism is designed to provide retention only at the fully closed position, allowing easy opening once initiated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism provides dynamic retention characteristics - maintaining strong holding force at the full close position through engagement, but allowing easy disengagement and free movement once the door begins to open. This creates a bimodal force characteristic rather than constant resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Reliability

If a latch apparatus retains the door at full close position, then the door remains securely closed, but a particularly large operational force is required in the beginning to release it

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedoor retentionVSAvoidoperational force
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The door operation is divided into two distinct force phases: Phase 1 requires a moderate force to disengage the latch from its retained position at full close, and Phase 2 allows the door to open with minimal force. The latch mechanism provides reliable retention during Phase 1, then transitions to free movement in Phase 2.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The latch mechanism exhibits dynamic behavior where it provides strong retention force when the door is at full close position, but automatically transitions to a low-resistance state once opening begins. This creates a force profile with a peak at the start of opening, then a sharp decline, rather than constant resistance throughout the opening motion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP2733292B1Door actuating apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.02.27 AISIN SEIKI KK
  • EP2733292B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2733292B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP2733292B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

A door actuating apparatus (20) includes an engagement mechanism (30) retaining a door (10) at a full close position, an operating portion (CT) outputting a signal to open the door (10), a control unit (ECU) actuating an actuator (70) in response to receiving the signal, an engagement member (41) advancing and retracting relative to the door (10) in accordance with rotation of the door (10), and a door opening mechanism (40, 50) operating by actuation of the actuator (70), positioning the door (10) at a full close position to a predetermined rotational position by rotating the door (10) in a vehicle exterior direction by biasing the engagement member (41) by engaging with the engagement member (41) when the door (10) is released from an engaged state by the door opening mechanism (40, 50) engaging with the engagement mechanism (30), and releasing engagement with the engagement member (41) in a state where an external force rotating the door (10) in the vehicle exterior direction is exerted on the door (10) at the predetermined rotational position.